Cardenas et al v. City Of Oakland et al
NOTICE RE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/19/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2017)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
RITA CARDENAS, an individual, L.V., by
and through her guardian ad litem Ruby
Cardenas, L.M., by and through her guardian
ad litem Ruby Cardenas, and DAVID ORTIZ,
No. C 16-05205 WHA
NOTICE RE HEARING ON
MOTION TO DISMISS
CITY OF ALAMEDA, a municipal
corporation, COLBY STAYSA, MATTHEW
FARRUGGIA, MICHAEL BUCKHOUT,
VICTOR FOX, RAMSEY JACKSON,
JAMES MCGRAIL, VICTOR RAMIREZ,
and DOES 1–25, individually and in their
At the July 13 hearing, the defendants should be prepared to hand up police reports
indicating which officer engaged in each specific act alleged in the proposed second amended
complaint to the extent that such identification is possible, so that the Court can determine who
can be sued for which. The defendants should also be prepared to explain for which acts they
are unable to identify a particular officer.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 19, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?