Mangiaracina et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al

Filing 55

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by BNSF Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation, BNSF Railway Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 2, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Joel Mangiaracina, et al. CASE No C 16-05270-JST Plaintiff( s) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v. BNSF Railway Company, et al. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and confe1red regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 0 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 0 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) liJ Private ADR (specifY process and provider) Full Day Mediation: Craig Needham, Esq. 1960 The Alameda #210, San Jose CA 95126 May 22, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an ear~v settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeed for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: rr:J the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.) liJ other requested deadline: May 30, 2017 Date: 2/2/17 Is/ Paula Rasmussen Date:2/2/17 Attorney for Plaintiff Is/Jeremy J. Schroeder Is/Christopher Witman Attorney for Defendant X IT IS SO ORDERED D 0 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: February 2, 2017 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE lmportum! E-file this form in ECFusing the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation &Proposed Order Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR. " FormADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?