Finn v. Sullivan et al

Filing 64

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiff may re-file the motion for leave as a Rule 59(e) motion. Defendants shall jointly file a single response to this order by February 15, 2017. Plaintiff shall file his response by February 24, 2017. The motion is set for hearing on March 8, 2017, at 2 p.m. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/27/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 STEPHEN A. FINN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-cv-05285-WHO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE KELLEEN F. SULLIVAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 59 Defendants. On January 13, 2017, I dismissed plaintiff’s claims with prejudice (Dkt. No. 55) and a 13 clerk’s judgment was entered (Dkt. No. 57). On January 19, 2017, plaintiff moved under Local 14 Rule 7-9 for leave to file a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of 15 Civil Procedure 59(e). Dkt. No. 59. Plaintiff may re-file this motion for leave re-styled as a Rule 16 59(e) motion (but not otherwise substantively altered) so that plaintiff can preserve his appellate 17 rights under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4)(iv). 18 Defendants are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the second paragraph of the January 19 13, 2017 Order (Dkt. No. 55) should not be stricken as plaintiff requests. Defendants shall jointly 20 file a single response to this order by February 15, 2017. Plaintiff shall file his response by 21 February 24, 2017. When filing their briefs on ECF, the parties should link to the docket number 22 for this Order to Show Cause. The motion is set for hearing on March 8, 2017, at 2 p.m. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 27, 2017 ________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?