Daly v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. et al
Filing
21
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 19 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Julie Daly
CASE No C 3:16-cv-5302-HSG
Plaintiff(s)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
v.
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. et al.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L .R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree' to participate in the
following ADR process:
IJjJ
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
lr:iJ
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
II Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties have agreed to private mediation
and are finalizing the provider and dates.
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeedfor
ADRPhone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
00 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date ofthe order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered.)
fJI other requested deadline:
Date:
Date:
if [1...&/1 G
Attorney for ~ti~
j;::_
~~fft
X
0 IT IS SO ORDERED
0 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: 11/30/2016
U.S. DISTRlCT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Important! E-jile this form in ECFusing the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order
Selecting Private ADR "
Form ADR-Stip rev. 11-2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?