Daly v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. et al

Filing 21

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 19 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2016)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Julie Daly

CASE No C 3:16-cv-5302-HSG
Plaintiff(s)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. et al.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L .R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree' to participate in the
following ADR process:
IJjJ

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

lr:iJ

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

II Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties have agreed to private mediation
and are finalizing the provider and dates.

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeedfor
ADRPhone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR

L.R. 3-5.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

00 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date ofthe order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered.)
fJI other requested deadline:
Date:
Date:

if [1...&/1 G

Attorney for ~ti~

j;::_

~~fft

X
0 IT IS SO ORDERED
0 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: 11/30/2016
U.S. DISTRlCT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Important! E-jile this form in ECFusing the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order
Selecting Private ADR "

Form ADR-Stip rev. 11-2016