Shenwick v. Twitter, Inc. et al

Filing 80

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 77 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE: SCHEDULING AND REQUEST TO ASSOCIATE ADDITIONAL COUNSEL filed by KBC Asset Management NV. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 18, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP LESLEY E. WEAVER 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 670 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (415) 445-4003 Facsimile: (415) 445-4020 Email: lweaver@bfalaw.com MOTLEY RICE LLC GREGG S. LEVIN (admitted pro hac vice) 28 Bridgeside Blvd. Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 Telephone: (843) 216-9000 Facsimile: (843) 216-9450 Email: glevin@motleyrice.com Liaison Counsel Lead Counsel for the Class [Additional counsel appear on signature page] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION : : : Plaintiff, : : v. :: : TWITTER, INC., et al., : : Defendants. : : CLAIRE DEGENHARDT, Individually and on : : Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : TWITTER, INC., RICHARD COSTOLO and : ANTHONY NOTO, : : Defendants. : : DORIS SHENWICK, et al., 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05314-JST Case No. 3:16-cv-05314-JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER AND REQUEST TO ASSOCIATE ADDITIONAL COUNSEL Case No. 3:16-cv-05439-JST 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the parties, lead plaintiff KBC Asset Management NV 2 (“KBC” or “Lead Plaintiff”) and defendants Twitter, Inc., Richard Costolo, and Anthony Noto 3 (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, submit the following 4 stipulation and proposed order: 5 6 WHEREAS, on December 22, 2016, the Court held a hearing on pending motions to appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel and to consolidate two related securities fraud cases, ECF No. 71; 7 WHEREAS, on the same day, the Court issued a written order granting KBC’s motion for 8 appointment as Lead Plaintiff, approving its selection of Motley Rice LLC (“Motley Rice”) as Lead 9 Counsel and Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP as liaison counsel, and consolidating Shenwick v. Twitter, 10 No. 3:16-cv-05314, with Degenhardt v. Twitter, No. 3:16-cv-05439, ECF No. 72; 11 WHEREAS, during the December 22, 2016 hearing, the Court ordered the parties to submit by 12 January 13, 2017 a stipulated or competing proposed case schedule(s), said schedule(s) to include a date 13 for an initial case management conference (“CMC”), and to address Lead Plaintiff’s intent to associate 14 certain counsel, ECF No. 71; 15 WHEREAS, the parties have met, conferred, and agreed on a proposed schedule; 16 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate to the following: 17 1. Lead Plaintiff shall file a Consolidated Amended Complaint no later than March 2, 2017; 18 2. An initial CMC shall be scheduled for April 19, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.; 19 3. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Motion 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 to Dismiss”) shall be filed on or before May 2, 2017; 4. Lead Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before June 21, 2017; 5. Defendants’ Reply Memorandum in support of their Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before August 7, 2017; and 6. The hearing on Defendants’ anticipated Motion to Dismiss shall be scheduled for Thursday, September 14, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05314-JST 1 OTHER MATTERS 1 2 During the December 22, 2016 hearing, Lead Counsel mentioned its intent to associate Robbins 3 Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”) in this case to work at Lead Plaintiff and Lead 4 Counsel’s direction in light of Robbins Geller’s extensive investigation and development of the case 5 which work product would be needlessly duplicative and expensive to replicate. Lead Counsel’s 6 association of additional counsel will not increase fees or costs potentially borne by the putative class. 7 8 Defendants take no position on Lead Counsel’s request to associate Robbins Geller. Dated: January 13, 2017 9 Respectfully submitted, BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP 10 By: /s/ Lesley E. Weaver Lesley E. Weaver 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 670 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (415) 445-4003 Facsimile: (415) 445-4020 Email: lweaver@bfalaw.com 11 12 13 14 15 Joseph A. Fonti (admitted pro hac vice) 7 Times Square, 27th Floor New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 789-1340 Facsimile: (212) 205-3960 Email: jfonti@bfalaw.com 16 17 18 19 Liaison Counsel 20 MOTLEY RICE LLC 21 Gregg S. Levin (admitted pro hac vice) 28 Bridgeside Blvd. Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 Telephone: (843) 216-9000 Facsimile: (843) 216-9450 Email: glevin@motleyrice.com 22 23 24 25 Lead Counsel for the Class 26 27 Dated: January 13, 2017 28 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP By: /s/ Simona G. Strauss Simona G. Strauss STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05314-JST 2 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 251-5000 Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 Email: sstrauss@stblaw.com 1 2 3 4 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP Jonathan K. Youngwood (admitted pro hac vice) 425 Lexington Ave New York, NY 10017-3954 Telephone: (212) 455-2000 Facsimile: (212) 455-2502 Email: jyoungwood@stblaw.com 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants Twitter, Inc., Anthony Noto, and Richard Costolo 9 10 11 I, Lesley E. Weaver, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 12 13 Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order and Request to Associate Additional Counsel. In 14 compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Simona G. Strauss has concurred in this 15 filing. /s/ Lesley E. Weaver Lesley E. Weaver 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Pursuant to Stipulation, the foregoing schedule is adopted by the Court. In addition, the Court approves Lead Counsel’s association of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 January 18, 2017 DATED: ___________________ 25 ________________________________ THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05314-JST 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?