Shenwick v. Twitter, Inc. et al
Filing
80
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 77 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE: SCHEDULING AND REQUEST TO ASSOCIATE ADDITIONAL COUNSEL filed by KBC Asset Management NV. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 18, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP
LESLEY E. WEAVER
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 670
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (415) 445-4003
Facsimile: (415) 445-4020
Email:
lweaver@bfalaw.com
MOTLEY RICE LLC
GREGG S. LEVIN (admitted pro hac vice)
28 Bridgeside Blvd.
Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464
Telephone: (843) 216-9000
Facsimile: (843) 216-9450
Email:
glevin@motleyrice.com
Liaison Counsel
Lead Counsel for the Class
[Additional counsel appear on signature page]
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
:
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
::
:
TWITTER, INC., et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
CLAIRE DEGENHARDT, Individually and on :
:
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
TWITTER, INC., RICHARD COSTOLO and :
ANTHONY NOTO,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
DORIS SHENWICK, et al.,
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05314-JST
Case No. 3:16-cv-05314-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
SCHEDULING ORDER AND REQUEST
TO ASSOCIATE ADDITIONAL COUNSEL
Case No. 3:16-cv-05439-JST
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the parties, lead plaintiff KBC Asset Management NV
2
(“KBC” or “Lead Plaintiff”) and defendants Twitter, Inc., Richard Costolo, and Anthony Noto
3
(collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, submit the following
4
stipulation and proposed order:
5
6
WHEREAS, on December 22, 2016, the Court held a hearing on pending motions to appoint
Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel and to consolidate two related securities fraud cases, ECF No. 71;
7
WHEREAS, on the same day, the Court issued a written order granting KBC’s motion for
8
appointment as Lead Plaintiff, approving its selection of Motley Rice LLC (“Motley Rice”) as Lead
9
Counsel and Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP as liaison counsel, and consolidating Shenwick v. Twitter,
10
No. 3:16-cv-05314, with Degenhardt v. Twitter, No. 3:16-cv-05439, ECF No. 72;
11
WHEREAS, during the December 22, 2016 hearing, the Court ordered the parties to submit by
12
January 13, 2017 a stipulated or competing proposed case schedule(s), said schedule(s) to include a date
13
for an initial case management conference (“CMC”), and to address Lead Plaintiff’s intent to associate
14
certain counsel, ECF No. 71;
15
WHEREAS, the parties have met, conferred, and agreed on a proposed schedule;
16
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate to the following:
17
1.
Lead Plaintiff shall file a Consolidated Amended Complaint no later than March 2, 2017;
18
2.
An initial CMC shall be scheduled for April 19, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.;
19
3.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Motion
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
to Dismiss”) shall be filed on or before May 2, 2017;
4.
Lead Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before
June 21, 2017;
5.
Defendants’ Reply Memorandum in support of their Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on
or before August 7, 2017; and
6.
The hearing on Defendants’ anticipated Motion to Dismiss shall be scheduled for
Thursday, September 14, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05314-JST
1
OTHER MATTERS
1
2
During the December 22, 2016 hearing, Lead Counsel mentioned its intent to associate Robbins
3
Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”) in this case to work at Lead Plaintiff and Lead
4
Counsel’s direction in light of Robbins Geller’s extensive investigation and development of the case
5
which work product would be needlessly duplicative and expensive to replicate. Lead Counsel’s
6
association of additional counsel will not increase fees or costs potentially borne by the putative class.
7
8
Defendants take no position on Lead Counsel’s request to associate Robbins Geller.
Dated: January 13, 2017
9
Respectfully submitted,
BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP
10
By: /s/ Lesley E. Weaver
Lesley E. Weaver
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 670
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (415) 445-4003
Facsimile: (415) 445-4020
Email:
lweaver@bfalaw.com
11
12
13
14
15
Joseph A. Fonti (admitted pro hac vice)
7 Times Square, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: (212) 789-1340
Facsimile: (212) 205-3960
Email:
jfonti@bfalaw.com
16
17
18
19
Liaison Counsel
20
MOTLEY RICE LLC
21
Gregg S. Levin (admitted pro hac vice)
28 Bridgeside Blvd.
Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464
Telephone: (843) 216-9000
Facsimile: (843) 216-9450
Email:
glevin@motleyrice.com
22
23
24
25
Lead Counsel for the Class
26
27
Dated: January 13, 2017
28
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
By: /s/ Simona G. Strauss
Simona G. Strauss
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05314-JST
2
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: (650) 251-5000
Facsimile: (650) 251-5002
Email:
sstrauss@stblaw.com
1
2
3
4
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
Jonathan K. Youngwood (admitted pro hac vice)
425 Lexington Ave
New York, NY 10017-3954
Telephone: (212) 455-2000
Facsimile: (212) 455-2502
Email:
jyoungwood@stblaw.com
5
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendants Twitter, Inc., Anthony
Noto, and Richard Costolo
9
10
11
I, Lesley E. Weaver, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
12
13
Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order and Request to Associate Additional Counsel.
In
14
compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Simona G. Strauss has concurred in this
15
filing.
/s/ Lesley E. Weaver
Lesley E. Weaver
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Pursuant to Stipulation, the foregoing schedule is adopted by the Court. In addition, the Court
approves Lead Counsel’s association of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
January 18, 2017
DATED: ___________________
25
________________________________
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05314-JST
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?