Vigdor et al v. Super Lucky Casino, Inc. et al

Filing 31

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 30 Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, and to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiffs' Response to Extend Time for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, and to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiffs' Response. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

SANFORD L. MICHELMAN, ESQ. (SBN 179702)
[e-mail]
RYAN HONG, ESQ. (SBN 174640)
[e-mail]
MARC R. JACOBS, ESQ. (SBN 185924)
[e-mail]
BENJAMIN HORWITZ, ESQ. (SBN 306757)
[e-mail]
MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP
10880 Wilshire Blvd., 19th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAN VIGDOR; STEPHEN BRADWAY

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

DAN VIGDOR, an individual; STEPHEN
BRADWAY, an individual,

15

Plaintiffs,
v.

16
17
18
19

SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., a California
corporation (formerly known as 12 GIGS,
INC.); NICHOLAS TALARICO, an
individual; DOES 1-50, inclusive,

20

Defendants.

21
22

Case No.: 16-cv-05326-HSG
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS,
AND TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’
RESPONSE
Current Deadline to File Response: 1/5/17
Stipulated Deadline to File Response: 1/17/17
Current Motion to Dismiss Hearing Date:
Date: March 2, 2017
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Dept.: Courtroom 10
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

23
Date Filed: September 1, 2016
Trial Date: None Set

24
25
26
27
28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS, AND FOR DEFENDANTS’ TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE
446126

1

ORDER

2

Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Defendants’

3

Motion to Dismiss is extended to January 17, 2017. Subsequently, Defendants’ deadline to respond

4

to Plaintiffs’ Response is extended to January 24, 2017.

5
6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: December 27, 2016

_____________________________
Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS, AND FOR DEFENDANTS’ TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE
446126