Sorihin et al v. Nguyen

Filing 60

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 59 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Thoai Van Nguyen. Case Management Statement due by 12/11/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/20/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 26, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2017)

Download PDF
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP LYNN L. KRIEGER, SB# 209592 2 MATTHEW W.J. JOHNSTON, SB# 300222 333 Bush Street, Suite 1100 3 San Francisco, California 94104-2872 Telephone: 415.362.2580 4 Facsimile: 415.434.0882 5 Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant THOAI VAN NGUYEN 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SORIHIN, aka SORIHIN SORIHIN, an individual; and ABDUL FATAH, an 12 individual, Plaintiff, 13 14 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-05422 JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE vs. 15 THOAI VAN NGUYEN, an individual doing business as SEA QUEEN II, 16 Defendant. 17 18 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS 19 20 The Parties in the above-entitled action jointly submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order 21 and request the Court to adopt it as the Order in this case. 22 WHEREAS, this Court scheduled a Case Management Conference in the above referenced 23 matter for November 8, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 24 WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a tentative settlement and are negotiating settlement 25 terms in an effort to resolve this suit, with the ongoing assistance of court-appointed neutral 26 Howard Herman; 27 LEWIS WHEREAS, the Parties intend to continue working with Mr. Herman to finalize the 28 remaining settlement terms in the coming weeks; BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4817-3523-8994.1 16-5422 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to continue the Case Management Conference to 2 December 6, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. or to a later date and time convenient to the Court; 3 THEREBY, the Parties stipulate to and respectfully request a continuance of the upcoming 4 Case Management Conference on November 8, 2017 to a date on or after December 6, 2017. 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 DATED: October 25, 2017 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH 7 By: 8 9 LLP /s/ Lynn L. Krieger Lynn L. Krieger Matthew W.J. Johnston Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant THOAI VAN NGUYEN 10 11 DATED: October 25, 2017 LEGAL AID AT WORK 12 By: 13 14 /s/ Mana Barari Mana Barari Carole Vigne Agnieszka Fryszman COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 15 16 Yenny Teng-Lee THE LAW OFFICE OF YENNY TENG-LEE 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SORIHIN, aka SORIHIN SORIHIN and ABDUL FATAH 18 19 20 21 22 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) I, Lynn L. Krieger, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained 23 from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United 24 States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 25 26 October 25, 2017 By: /s/ Lynn L. Krieger Lynn L. Krieger 27 LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4817-3523-8994.1 16-5422 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Based upon the agreement of the Parties, and the Court finding good cause, IT IS 3 HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Parties’ Stipulation to Continue the Case Management 4 Conference is GRANTED and entered as an Order of the Court. The Case Management 5 Conference currently scheduled for November 8, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. is continued to December 20 2:00 p.m. 6 _________________, 2017 at __________. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 October 26 10 DATED: _______________, 2017 11 12 HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4817-3523-8994.1 16-5422 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?