Hauck et al v. Cordis Corporation et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FORDEFENDANT CONFLUENT MEDICALTECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO RESPOND TOCOMPLAINT re 20 Stipulation filed by Confluent Medical Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/17/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MICHELLE A. CHILDERS (SBN 197064)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW J. ADLER (SBN 273147)
[e-mail]
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2235
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
CONFLUENT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

DONALD G. HAUCK, an individual;
BESSIE BLANKS, an individual;
SHARON WILLEY, an individual;
WILLIAM ROBERTS, an individual;
JOHN SZYMANSKI, an individual;
HERBERT BEENE, an individual;
individual; BENJAMIN LENARD, an
TRULA LEVINE, an individual; ROBIN
DILLOW, an individual; STEPHANIE
LASTRAPES-DENNIS, an individual;
MICHAEL ROUX, SR., an individual;
JOSEPH D. DOUCET, an individual;
BRIAN ALFRED, an individual;
GERALDINE CLARK, an individual,
LORI GODFREY; an individual,

20

Case No. 4:16-cv-05455-EMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT CONFLUENT MEDICAL
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs,

21

v.

22

CORDIS CORPORATION, a corporation ;
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, a corporation;
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., a
corporation; CONFLUENT MEDICAL
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a corporation;
and DOES 1 through 50,

23
24
25

Defendants.
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
86771681.1

CASE NO. 4:16-CV-05455-EMC

1
2

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of
Alameda on August 23, 2016;

3
4

WHEREAS, Defendant Confluent Medical Technologies, Inc. (“Confluent”) was served
with the Complaint on August 24, 2016;

5
6

WHEREAS, Defendant Cordis Corporation filed a Notice of Removal on September 23,
2016;

7

WHEREAS, a conflict has arisen with respect to counsel for Confluent;

8

WHEREAS, due to this conflict, Confluent is in the process of retaining new counsel and

9
10

requires additional time to prepare its response to the Complaint;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Confluent have met and conferred through counsel and agree

11

that, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Confluent’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the

12

Complaint shall be continued to November 14, 2016;

13
14
15

WHEREAS, the brief extension set forth herein will not alter the date of any event or any
deadline already set by the Court in this action;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Confluent through their

16

respective counsel that the deadline for Confluent to answer or otherwise respond to the

17

Complaint is continued to November 14, 2016.

18
19

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: October 13, 2016

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

20
21

By: /s/ Matthew J. Adler
Michelle A. Childers
Matthew J. Adler

22
23

Attorneys for Defendant
CONFLUENT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.

24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
86771681.1

-2-

CASE NO. 4:16-CV-05455-EMC

1

Dated: October 13, 2016

LOPEZ MCHUGH LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Matthew Ramon Lopez
Ramon Rossi Lopez
Matthew Ramon Lopez
Amorina Patrice Lopez

4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6

Attestation Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)
7
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I, Matthew J. Adler, hereby attest that I have obtained
8
concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory to this document.
9
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
10
foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 13th day of October, 2016 in San Francisco,
11
California.
12

S

O ORD
IT IS S

17
dwar
Judge E

ER

A

H

20

en

LI

RT

19

ERED

d M. Ch

NO

18

/s/ Matthew J. Adler
Matthew J. Adler

FO

16

UNIT
ED

15

RT
U
O

14

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

13

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
86771681.1

-3-

CASE NO. 4:16-CV-05455-EMC