Timothy Glick v. Performant Financial Corporation

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Timothy Glick filed by Timothy Glick. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 19, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2016)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-05461-JST Document 22 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 1 Reset Form UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Timothy Glick CASE No C 16-cv-05461-JST Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Performant Financial Corporation Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:    Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) s  Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)  Private ADR (specify process and provider) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:  the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. )  other requested deadline: After March 1, 2017 s Date: 12/16/2016 Date: 12/16/2016 /s/ Patrick H. Peluso Attorney for Plaintiff  /s/ Stephen Watkins Attorney for Defendant   IT IS SO ORDERED X  IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: The deadline will be March 31, 2017 Date: December 19, 2016 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE  Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 11-2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?