Shaev v. Baker, II et al

Filing 135

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 134 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE filed by Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 30, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Richard M. Heimann (063607)
[e-mail]
Joy A. Kruse (142799)
[e-mail]
Katherine C. Lubin (259826)
[e-mail]
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Fire & Police
Pension Association of Colorado and CoLead Counsel
Maya Saxena (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Joseph E. White, III (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Lester R. Hooker (241590)
[e-mail]
Jorge A. Amador (237800)
[e-mail]
SAXENA WHITE P.A.
5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 601
Boca Raton, FL 33486
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
Attorneys for Plaintiff The City of
Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
and Co-Lead Counsel

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21
Lead Case No. 3:16-cv-05541-JST

22
23
24

IN RE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
LITIGATION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar

25
26

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2017, the Court entered an order setting the briefing schedule

27

on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint on the threshold issue of demand

28

futility [Dkt. 81];
1

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1

Whereas, the February 8, 2017 order preserved Defendants’ right to assert other defenses,

2

including by motion or otherwise, after the Court’s consideration of Defendants’ demand futility

3

motion to dismiss;

4

WHEREAS, on February 24, 2017, Lead Plaintiffs Fire and Police Pension Association of

5

Colorado and The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System filed their Consolidated

6

Amended Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint [Dkt. 83];

7

WHEREAS, on March 17, 2017, Defendants filed their motion to dismiss for failure to

8

adequately plead demand futility [Dkt. 99], which Plaintiffs opposed on April 3, 2017 [Dkt. 115]

9

and Defendants replied to on April 14, 2017 [Dkt. 116];

10
11
12

WHEREAS, on May 4, 2017, the Court held argument on Defendants’ motion to dismiss
on demand futility grounds;
WHEREAS, on May 4, 2017, the Court denied in part and granted in part Defendants’

13

motion to dismiss [Dkt. 129], holding that Plaintiffs had adequately pled demand futility;

14

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed on a schedule for briefing any

15

remaining motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 that Defendants

16

intend to make;

17

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Lead

18

Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, and Defendants, by and through their counsel, that the

19

following schedule shall be in effect for the filing of Defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to

20

Rule 12:

21
22
23
24

Last Day to File Motion to Dismiss or Otherwise Respond
to the Amended Complaint: June 5, 2017
Last Day to File Response to Motion to Dismiss: July 5, 2017
Last Day to File Reply to Responses: 21 days from filing of Response to
Motion to Dismiss

25
Hearing on Motion to Dismiss: At the Court’s convenience
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
Dated: May 23, 2017

LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP

2
3

By:

4

Richard M. Heimann (063607)
[e-mail]
Joy A. Kruse (142799)
[e-mail]
Katherine C. Lubin (259826)
[e-mail]
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

/s/ Richard M. Heimann

Steven E. Fineman (140335)
[e-mail]
Daniel P. Chiplock (pro hac vice application to be filed)
[e-mail]
Nicholas Diamand (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Michael J. Miarmi (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013-1413
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Fire & Police Pension Association
of Colorado and Co-Lead Counsel

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Maya Saxena (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Joseph E. White, III (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Lester R. Hooker (241590)
[e-mail]
Jorge A. Amador (237800)
[e-mail]
Adam D. Warden (Pro hac vice application to be filed)
[e-mail]
Dianne M. Anderson (CA Bar No. 103670)
[e-mail]
SAXENA WHITE P.A.
5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 601
Boca Raton, FL 33486
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Steven B. Singer (Pro hac vice application to be filed)
4 West Red Oak Lane, Suite 312
White Plains, NY 10604
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff The City of Birmingham
Retirement and Relief System and Co-Lead Counsel

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
/s/ Brendan P. Cullen

By:

Richard H. Klapper (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004-2498
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
([e-mail])
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303-3308
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Christopher M. Viapiano (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1700 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Gilbert R. Serota (SBN 75305)
([e-mail])
ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

13
14
15

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Wells Fargo & Co.
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

By:

/s/ Grant P. Fondo

Richard M. Strassberg (pro hac vice forthcoming)
([e-mail])
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
620 8th Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Grant P. Fondo
([e-mail])
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

25
26

Attorneys for Defendant John G. Stumpf

27
28
5

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
CLARENCE DYER & COHEN LLP
2
3

By:

4

8

Nanci L. Clarence
([e-mail])
Josh A. Cohen
([e-mail])
CLARENCE DYER & COHEN LLP
899 Ellis Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9

Attorneys for Defendant Timothy J. Sloan

5
6
7

/s/ Nanci L. Clarence

10

ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY, LLP

11

By:

12

Cristina C. Arguedas
([e-mail])
Laurel L. Headley
([e-mail])
Ted W. Cassman
([e-mail])
ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY, LLP
803 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, California 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

/s/ Ted W. Cassman

Attorneys for Defendant Michael J. Loughlin
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP

21
22

By:

23

Enu A. Mainigi (pro hac vice forthcoming)
([e-mail])
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant Carrie Tolstedt

24
25
26

/s/ Enu A. Mainigi

27
28
6

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
2
3

By:

4

Jaculin Aaron
([e-mail])
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10

/s/ Jaculin Aaron

Attorneys for Defendants John D. Baker II, Elaine L.
Chao, John S. Chen, Lloyd H. Dean, Elizabeth A. Duke,
Susan E. Engel, Enrique Hernandez, Jr., Donald M.
James, Cynthia H. Milligan, Federico F. Peña, James H.
Quigley, Stephen W. Sanger, Susan G. Swenson and
Suzanne M. Vautrinot

11
12

RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP

13
By:
14
15
16
17
18
19

/s/ Ismail Ramsey

Miles Ehrlich
([e-mail])
Ismail Ramsey
([e-mail])
RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP
803 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant John R. Shrewsberry

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

2
3
4

I, Richard M. Heimann, in compliance with General Order 45, Section X(B),
hereby attest that I obtained the concurrence of all of the above-listed counsel in filing this
document.

5
6

DATED: May 23, 2017

/s/ Richard M. Heimann
Richard M. Heimann

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
ORDER

2
3

THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: May 30, 2017
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

9

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST