Shaev v. Baker, II et al

Filing 138

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 137 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Defendant John G. Stumpf's Response to the Consolidated Complaint filed by John G. Stumpf. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 5, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Grant P. Fondo (181530)
[e-mail]
Lloyd Winawer (157823)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Richard M. Strassberg (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
The New York Times Building
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[Additional counsel identified on signature
page]
Attorneys for Defendant
John G. Stumpf

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18

IN RE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
LITIGATION

Lead Case No. 3:16-cv-05541-JST

This Document Relates To:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DEFENDANT JOHN G.
STUMPF’S RESPONSE TO THE
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

19
20
21
22
23

ALL ACTIONS.

(Consolidated with Nos. 3:16-cv-05592; 3:16cv-05745; 3:16-cv-05817; 3:16-cv-05915; 3:16cv-06262; 3:16-cv-06624; and 3:16-cv-06631)

Courtroom: 9, 19th Floor
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Judge:

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT JOHN G. STUMPF’S RESPONSE TO THE
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2 and 7-12, Lead Plaintiffs Fire and Police Pension

2

Association of Colorado and The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System (“Lead

3

Plaintiffs”) and Defendant John G. Stumpf, by and through their undersigned counsel of record,

4

hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

5

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2017, the Court entered an order setting the briefing schedule on

6

Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint on the threshold issue of demand futility,

7

while preserving Defendants’ right to assert other defenses, including by motion or otherwise, after

8

the Court’s consideration of Defendants’ demand futility motion to dismiss [Dkt. 81];

9
10
11

WHEREAS, on February 24, 2017, Lead Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended
Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint (“Complaint”) [Dkt. 83];
WHEREAS, on March 17, 2017, Defendant Wells Fargo & Co. filed a motion to dismiss the

12

Complaint for failure to adequately plead demand futility [Dkt. 99], which was fully briefed and

13

subsequently argued before this Court on May 4, 2017;

14

WHEREAS, on May 4, 2017, the Court issued an order denying in part and granting in part

15

Defendant Wells Fargo & Co.’s motion to dismiss [Dkt. 129], holding that Plaintiffs had adequately

16

pled demand futility;

17

WHEREAS, on May 30, 2017, the Court issued an order approving a stipulation among all

18

parties in this action and ordering that Defendants shall move to dismiss or otherwise respond to the

19

Complaint on or before June 5, 2017;

20
21
22

WHEREAS, it is anticipated that certain Defendants will file motions to dismiss the
Complaint on June 5, 2017;
WHEREAS, counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and Mr. Stumpf have met and agreed that in the

23

event that Mr. Stumpf does not join in any motion to dismiss filed by any Defendant on or before

24

June 5, 2017, justification and good cause exists for extending until June 30, 2017 the date by which

25

Mr. Stumpf shall file an answer to the Complaint.

26

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Lead

27

Plaintiffs and Mr. Stumpf, by and through their respective counsel, that in the event that Mr. Stumpf

28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT JOHN G. STUMPF’S RESPONSE TO THE
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1

does not join in any Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint on or before June 5, 2017, Mr.

2

Stumpf shall file an answer to the Complaint on or before June 30, 2017.

3
4
5

Dated: June 2, 2017

6

By: /s/ Lloyd Winawer
Grant P. Fondo (181530)
[e-mail]
Lloyd Winawer (157823)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

7
8
9
10
11

Richard M. Strassberg (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
The New York Times Building
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
John G. Stumpf

17
18

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Dated: June 2, 2017

LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

By: /s/ Richard M. Heimann (with permission)
Richard M. Heimann (063607)
[e-mail]
Joy A. Kruse (142799)
[e-mail]
Katherine C. Lubin (259826)
[e-mail]
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT JOHN G. STUMPF’S RESPONSE TO THE
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Steven E. Fineman (140335)
[e-mail]
Daniel P. Chiplock (pro hac vice application to
be filed)
[e-mail]
Nicholas Diamand (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Michael J. Miarmi (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013-1413
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Fire & Police Pension
Association of Colorado and Co-Lead Counsel
Maya Saxena (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Joseph E. White, III (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Lester R. Hooker (241590)
[e-mail]
Jorge A. Amador (237800)
[e-mail]
Adam D. Warden (Pro hac vice application to
be filed)
[e-mail]
Dianne M. Anderson (103670)
[e-mail]
SAXENA WHITE P.A.
5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 601
Boca Raton, FL 33486
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Steven B. Singer (Pro hac vice application to
be filed)
4 West Red Oak Lane, Suite 312
White Plains, NY 10604
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff The City of
Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
and Co-Lead Counsel

26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT JOHN G. STUMPF’S RESPONSE TO THE
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
2
3

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
I, Lloyd Winawer, hereby attest, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5-1(i)(3) that I obtained the
concurrence of all of the above-listed counsel in filing this document.

4
5

DATED: June 2, 2017

/s/ Lloyd Winawer
Lloyd Winawer

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT JOHN G. STUMPF’S RESPONSE TO THE
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
2

ORDER
THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated:

June 5, 2017
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT JOHN G. STUMPF’S RESPONSE TO THE
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST