Shaev v. Baker, II et al

Filing 183

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 182 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Concerning the Deadline for Answering the Complaint filed by Federico F. Pena, James H. Quigley, Susan E. Engel, Elizabeth A. Duke, Donald M . James, Judith M. Runstad, Susan G. Swenson, Stephen W. Sanger, Enrique Hernandez, Jr., John D. Baker, II, Suzanne M. Vautrinot, Cynthia M. Milligan, John S. Chen, Elaine L. Chao, Lloyd H. Dean. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 13, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)

1 Stuart J. Baskin (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
2 Jaculin Aaron (SBN 133983)
[e-mail]
3 SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
4 New York, NY 10022-6069
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: 212.848.7179
6 John F. Cove, Jr. (SBN 212213)
[e-mail]
7 Emily V. Griffen (SBN 209162)
[e-mail]
8 Lisa M. Valenti-Jordan (SBN 300161)
[e-mail]
9 SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
535 Mission Street, 25th Floor
10 San Francisco, CA 94105-2997
Telephone: [phone]
11 Facsimile: 415.616.1199
12 Attorneys for Defendants John D. Baker II,
Elaine L. Chao, John S. Chen, Lloyd H. Dean,
13 Elizabeth A. Duke, Susan E. Engel, Enrique
Hernandez, Jr., Donald M. James, Cynthia H.
14 Milligan, Federico F. Peña, James H. Quigley,
Judith M. Runstad, Stephen W. Sanger, Susan
15 G. Swenson, and Suzanne M. Vautrinot
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19 In re WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
20 LITIGATION
21
22
23

This Document Relates To:

Lead Case No. 3:16-cv-05541-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONCERNING THE
DEADLINE FOR ANSWERING THE
COMPLAINT
Judge:

Hon Jon S. Tigar

ALL ACTIONS.

24
25
26
27
28
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONCERNING THE DEADLINE FOR
ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT

LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

WHEREAS, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Individual Defendants’

1

2 Motions to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint
3 (“Amended Complaint”) on October 4, 2017;
WHEREAS, the current deadline for answering the Amended Complaint is November 17,

4
5 2017;
6

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have conferred and agreed, subject to Court approval,

7 to extend the Individual Defendants’ deadline to answer the Amended Complaint to January 8,
8 2018; and
9

WHEREAS, the parties agree that this new deadline is appropriate in this case given the

10 length of the Amended Complaint and the large number of Individual Defendants represented by
11 numerous different law firms.
12

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between the

13 parties, by and through their Counsel, that the Individual Defendants’ deadline for answering the
14 Amended Complaint shall be extended to January 8, 2018.
15 Dated: November 10, 2017

SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP

16
17

By:

18

Jaculin Aaron
([e-mail])
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]

19
20
21
22

/s/ Jaculin Aaron

Attorneys for Defendants John D. Baker II, Elaine L.
Chao, John S. Chen, Lloyd H. Dean, Elizabeth A. Duke,
Susan E. Engel, Enrique Hernandez, Jr., Donald M.
James, Cynthia H. Milligan, Federico F. Peña, James H.
Quigley, Judith M. Runstad, Stephen W. Sanger, Susan G.
Swenson, and Suzanne M. Vautrinot

23
24
25
26
27
28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONCERNING THE DEADLINE FOR
ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT

1

LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
2
3

By:

4

Richard M. Heimann (063607)
[e-mail]
Katherine C. Lubin (259826)
[e-mail]
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7
8

/s/ Richard M. Heimann

Steven E. Fineman (CA Bar No. 140335)
[e-mail]
Joy A. Kruse (CA Bar No. 142799)
[e-mail]
Daniel P. Chiplock (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Nicholas Diamand (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Michael J. Miarmi (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013-1413
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Co-Lead Plaintiff Fire & Police Pension
Association of Colorado and Co-Lead Counsel

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONCERNING THE DEADLINE FOR
ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT

2

LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

Maya Saxena (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Joseph E. White, III (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Lester R. Hooker (CA Bar No. 241590)
[e-mail]
Jorge A. Amador (CA Bar No. 237800)
[e-mail]
Adam D. Warden (pro hac vice application to be filed)
[e-mail]
Dianne M. Anderson (CA Bar No. 103670)
[e-mail]
SAXENA WHITE P.A.
150 East Palmetto Park Road, Suite 600
Boca Raton, FL 33432
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Steven B. Singer (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Kyla Grant (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
4 West Red Oak Lane, Suite 312
White Plains, NY 10604
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Co-Lead Plaintiff The City of Birmingham
Retirement and Relief System and Co-Lead Counsel

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONCERNING THE DEADLINE FOR
ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT

3

LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

2

By:

3

Richard H. Klapper (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004-2498
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5
6

/s/ Brendan P. Cullen

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
([e-mail])
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7
8
9
10

Christopher M. Viapiano (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1700 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

11
12
13
14
15

Gilbert R. Serota (SBN 75305)
([e-mail])
ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 10
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

16
17
18
19

Counsel for Nominal Defendant
Wells Fargo & Company

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONCERNING THE DEADLINE FOR
ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT

4

LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
2
By:
3

/s/ Grant P. Fondo

Richard M. Strassberg (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
620 8th Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5
6
7

Grant P. Fondo
([e-mail])
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Defendant John G. Stumpf

12
13

CLARENCE DYER & COHEN LLP

14

By:

15

Nanci L. Clarence
([e-mail])
Josh A. Cohen
([e-mail])
CLARENCE DYER & COHEN LLP
899 Ellis Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

16
17
18
19

/s/ Josh A. Cohen

Attorneys for Defendant Timothy J. Sloan

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONCERNING THE DEADLINE FOR
ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT

5

LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP
2
By:
3

/s/ Ismail Ramsey

Miles Ehrlich
([e-mail])
Ismail Ramsey
([e-mail])
RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP
803 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendant John R. Shrewsberry
9
10

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP

11

By:

12

15

Enu A. Mainigi (admitted pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

16

Attorneys for Defendant Carrie Tolstedt

13
14

/s/ Enu A. Mainigi

17
ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY, LLP

18

By:

19

/s/ Ted W. Cassman

Cristina C. Arguedas
([e-mail])
Ted W. Cassman
([e-mail])
ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY, LLP
803 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

20
21
22
23
24

Attorneys for Defendant Michael J. Loughlin
25
26
27
28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONCERNING THE DEADLINE FOR
ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT

6

LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

1
2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Lisa Valenti-Jordan, in compliance with General Order 45, Section X(B), hereby

3 attest that I obtained the concurrence of all of the above-listed counsel in filing this document.
4

DATED: November 10, 2017

/s/ Lisa Valenti-Jordan

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONCERNING THE DEADLINE FOR
ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT

7

LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST

ORDER

1

2 THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4 Dated:

November 13, 2017
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONCERNING THE DEADLINE FOR
ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT

8

LEAD CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST