Shaev v. Baker, II et al
Filing
79
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 78 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Wells Fargo & Company. Case Management Statement due by 9/18/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/27/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 24, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
(cullenb@sullcrom.com)
Sverker K. Hogberg (SBN 244640)
(hogbergs@sullcrom.com)
Ryan J. McCauley (SBN 264913)
(mccauleyr@sullcrom.com)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone:
(650) 461-5600
Facsimile:
(650) 461-5700
10
Christopher M. Viapiano (pro hac vice)
(viapianoc@sullcrom.com)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1700 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone:
(202) 956-6985
Facsimile:
(202) 956-7056
11
Counsel for Defendant Wells Fargo & Company
12
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
8
9
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
Lead Case No. 16-cv-05541-JST
In Re WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
LITIGATION
19
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
20
21
22
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2017, the Court heard argument on competing motions to
appoint lead plaintiffs and lead counsel;
23
24
WHEREAS, at the hearing on January 12, 2017, the Court invited the parties to file a
stipulation to continue the case management conference currently scheduled for January 25, 2017;
25
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2017, the Court continued the case management conference
26
in the related federal securities class action, Hefler v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 3:16-cv-05479-JST (N.D.
27
Cal.), to September 27, 2017;
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
1336397.1
1
2
WHEREAS, on January 13, 2017, the Court entered its Order Regarding Motions to
Consolidate and Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Counsel;
3
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed that the interests of judicial efficiency
4
and economy would be best served by continuing the case management conference until the time set by
5
the Court for the case management conference in the related federal securities class action;
6
WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed that, in the event circumstances necessitate
7
an earlier case management conference, they will determine a mutually agreeable date for an earlier
8
conference at the Court’s availability.
9
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Lead
10
Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, and Defendants, by and through their counsel, that the case
11
management conference currently scheduled for January 25, 2017 shall be continued to September 27,
12
2017 at 2 p.m.
13
Dated: January 23, 2017
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
14
By:
/s/ Richard M. Heimann
15
Richard M. Heimann (CA Bar No. 063607)
rheimann@lchb.com
Katherine C. Lubin (CA Bar No. 259826)
kbenson@lchb.com
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
16
17
18
19
20
Steven E. Fineman (CA Bar No. 140335)
sfineman@lchb.com
Joy A. Kruse (CA Bar No. 142799)
jakruse@lchb.com
Daniel P. Chiplock (Pro hac vice application to be filed)
dchiplock@lchb.com
Nicholas Diamand (Pro hac vice)
ndiamand@lchb.com
Michael J. Miarmi (Pro hac vice application to be filed)
mmiarmi@lchb.com
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013-1413
Telephone: (212) 355-9500
Facsimile: (212) 355-9592
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
1336397.1
1
Co-Lead Counsel for the Class
2
11
SAXENA WHITE P.A.
Maya Saxena (Pro hac vice)
msaxena@saxenawhite.com
Joseph E. White, III (Pro hac vice)
jwhite@saxenawhite.com
Steven B. Singer (Pro hac vice application to be filed)
ssinger@saxenawhite.com
Lester R. Hooker (CA Bar No. 241590)
lhooker@saxenawhite.com
Jorge A. Amador (CA Bar No. 237800)
jamador@saxenawhite.com
Adam D. Warden (Pro hac vice application to be filed)
awarden@saxenawhite.com
Dianne M. Anderson (CA Bar No. 103670)
danderson@saxenawhite.com
5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 601
Boca Raton, FL 33486
Telephone: (561) 394-3399
Facsimile: (561) 394-3382
12
Co-Lead Counsel for the Class
13
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
14
By: _____/s Brendan P. Cullen____________
15
Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
(cullenb@sullcrom.com)
Sverker K. Hogberg (SBN 244640)
(hogbergs@sullcrom.com)
Ryan J. McCauley (SBN 264913)
(mccauleyr@sullcrom.com)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone:
(650) 461-5600
Facsimile:
(650) 461-5700
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
16
17
18
19
20
Attorneys for Nominal Defendant
Wells Fargo & Co.
21
22
23
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
24
By: ____/s_Grant P. Fondo______________
25
Richard M. Strassberg (pro hac vice pending)
(rstrassberg@goodwinlaw.com)
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
620 8th Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Telephone:
(212) 813-8800
Facsimile:
(212) 355-3333
3
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
1336397.1
1
Grant P. Fondo
(gfondo@goodwinlaw.com)
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
(650) 752-3100
Facsimile:
(650) 853-1038
2
3
4
5
Attorneys for Defendant John G. Stumpf
6
7
CLARENCE DYER & COHEN LLP
8
By: ______/s Nanci L. Clarence________
9
13
Nanci L. Clarence
(nclarence@clarencedyer.com)
Josh A. Cohen
(jcohen@clarencedyer.com)
CLARENCE DYER & COHEN LLP
899 Ellis Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone:
(415) 749-1800
Facsimile:
(415) 749-1694
14
Attorneys for Defendant Timothy J. Sloan
10
11
12
15
RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP
16
By: /s Ismail Ramsey
17
Miles Ehrlich
(miles@ramsey-ehrlich.com)
Ismail Ramsey
(izzy@ramsey-ehrlich.com)
RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP
803 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone:
(510) 548-3600
Facsimile:
(510) 291-3060
18
19
20
21
22
Attorneys for Defendant John R. Shrewsberry
23
24
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
25
By: /s Enu A. Mainigi______
26
Enu A. Mainigi (pro hac vice forthcoming)
(emainigi@wc.com)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20005
4
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
1336397.1
1
Telephone:
Facsimile:
(202) 434-5000
(202) 434-5029
2
Attorneys for Defendant Carrie Tolstedt
3
4
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
5
By: _/s Jaculin Aaron
6
Jaculin Aaron
(jaaron@shearman.com)
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone:
(212) 848-4000
Facsimile:
(212) 848-7179
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendants John D. Baker II, Elaine L.
Chao, John S. Chen, Lloyd H. Dean, Elizabeth A. Duke,
Susan E. Engel, Enrique Hernandez, Jr., Donald M.
James, Cynthia H. Milligan, Federico F. Peña, James H.
Quigley, Stephen W. Sanger, Susan G. Swenson and
Suzanne M. Vautrinot
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
19
20
I, Brendan P. Cullen, in compliance with General Order 45, Section X(B), hereby attest
that I obtained the concurrence of all of the above-listed counsel in filing this document.
21
22
DATED: January 23, 2017
/s/ Brendan P. Cullen
Brendan P. Cullen
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
1336397.1
1
2
ORDER
THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated:
January 24, 2017
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP
1336397.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?