Shaev v. Baker, II et al

Filing 79

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 78 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Wells Fargo & Company. Case Management Statement due by 9/18/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/27/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 24, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) (cullenb@sullcrom.com) Sverker K. Hogberg (SBN 244640) (hogbergs@sullcrom.com) Ryan J. McCauley (SBN 264913) (mccauleyr@sullcrom.com) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 10 Christopher M. Viapiano (pro hac vice) (viapianoc@sullcrom.com) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1700 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 956-6985 Facsimile: (202) 956-7056 11 Counsel for Defendant Wells Fargo & Company 12 [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 8 9 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 Lead Case No. 16-cv-05541-JST In Re WELLS FARGO & COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION 19 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE The Honorable Jon S. Tigar 20 21 22 WHEREAS, on January 12, 2017, the Court heard argument on competing motions to appoint lead plaintiffs and lead counsel; 23 24 WHEREAS, at the hearing on January 12, 2017, the Court invited the parties to file a stipulation to continue the case management conference currently scheduled for January 25, 2017; 25 WHEREAS, on January 12, 2017, the Court continued the case management conference 26 in the related federal securities class action, Hefler v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 3:16-cv-05479-JST (N.D. 27 Cal.), to September 27, 2017; 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1336397.1 1 2 WHEREAS, on January 13, 2017, the Court entered its Order Regarding Motions to Consolidate and Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Counsel; 3 WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed that the interests of judicial efficiency 4 and economy would be best served by continuing the case management conference until the time set by 5 the Court for the case management conference in the related federal securities class action; 6 WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed that, in the event circumstances necessitate 7 an earlier case management conference, they will determine a mutually agreeable date for an earlier 8 conference at the Court’s availability. 9 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Lead 10 Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, and Defendants, by and through their counsel, that the case 11 management conference currently scheduled for January 25, 2017 shall be continued to September 27, 12 2017 at 2 p.m. 13 Dated: January 23, 2017 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 14 By: /s/ Richard M. Heimann 15 Richard M. Heimann (CA Bar No. 063607) rheimann@lchb.com Katherine C. Lubin (CA Bar No. 259826) kbenson@lchb.com 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 16 17 18 19 20 Steven E. Fineman (CA Bar No. 140335) sfineman@lchb.com Joy A. Kruse (CA Bar No. 142799) jakruse@lchb.com Daniel P. Chiplock (Pro hac vice application to be filed) dchiplock@lchb.com Nicholas Diamand (Pro hac vice) ndiamand@lchb.com Michael J. Miarmi (Pro hac vice application to be filed) mmiarmi@lchb.com Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP 250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10013-1413 Telephone: (212) 355-9500 Facsimile: (212) 355-9592 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1336397.1 1 Co-Lead Counsel for the Class 2 11 SAXENA WHITE P.A. Maya Saxena (Pro hac vice) msaxena@saxenawhite.com Joseph E. White, III (Pro hac vice) jwhite@saxenawhite.com Steven B. Singer (Pro hac vice application to be filed) ssinger@saxenawhite.com Lester R. Hooker (CA Bar No. 241590) lhooker@saxenawhite.com Jorge A. Amador (CA Bar No. 237800) jamador@saxenawhite.com Adam D. Warden (Pro hac vice application to be filed) awarden@saxenawhite.com Dianne M. Anderson (CA Bar No. 103670) danderson@saxenawhite.com 5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 601 Boca Raton, FL 33486 Telephone: (561) 394-3399 Facsimile: (561) 394-3382 12 Co-Lead Counsel for the Class 13 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 14 By: _____/s Brendan P. Cullen____________ 15 Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) (cullenb@sullcrom.com) Sverker K. Hogberg (SBN 244640) (hogbergs@sullcrom.com) Ryan J. McCauley (SBN 264913) (mccauleyr@sullcrom.com) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 16 17 18 19 20 Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Wells Fargo & Co. 21 22 23 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 24 By: ____/s_Grant P. Fondo______________ 25 Richard M. Strassberg (pro hac vice pending) (rstrassberg@goodwinlaw.com) GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 620 8th Avenue New York, NY 10018 Telephone: (212) 813-8800 Facsimile: (212) 355-3333 3 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1336397.1 1 Grant P. Fondo (gfondo@goodwinlaw.com) GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 752-3100 Facsimile: (650) 853-1038 2 3 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant John G. Stumpf 6 7 CLARENCE DYER & COHEN LLP 8 By: ______/s Nanci L. Clarence________ 9 13 Nanci L. Clarence (nclarence@clarencedyer.com) Josh A. Cohen (jcohen@clarencedyer.com) CLARENCE DYER & COHEN LLP 899 Ellis Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 749-1800 Facsimile: (415) 749-1694 14 Attorneys for Defendant Timothy J. Sloan 10 11 12 15 RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP 16 By: /s Ismail Ramsey 17 Miles Ehrlich (miles@ramsey-ehrlich.com) Ismail Ramsey (izzy@ramsey-ehrlich.com) RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP 803 Hearst Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 548-3600 Facsimile: (510) 291-3060 18 19 20 21 22 Attorneys for Defendant John R. Shrewsberry 23 24 WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 25 By: /s Enu A. Mainigi______ 26 Enu A. Mainigi (pro hac vice forthcoming) (emainigi@wc.com) WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20005 4 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1336397.1 1 Telephone: Facsimile: (202) 434-5000 (202) 434-5029 2 Attorneys for Defendant Carrie Tolstedt 3 4 SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 5 By: _/s Jaculin Aaron 6 Jaculin Aaron (jaaron@shearman.com) SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 848-4000 Facsimile: (212) 848-7179 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants John D. Baker II, Elaine L. Chao, John S. Chen, Lloyd H. Dean, Elizabeth A. Duke, Susan E. Engel, Enrique Hernandez, Jr., Donald M. James, Cynthia H. Milligan, Federico F. Peña, James H. Quigley, Stephen W. Sanger, Susan G. Swenson and Suzanne M. Vautrinot 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 19 20 I, Brendan P. Cullen, in compliance with General Order 45, Section X(B), hereby attest that I obtained the concurrence of all of the above-listed counsel in filing this document. 21 22 DATED: January 23, 2017 /s/ Brendan P. Cullen Brendan P. Cullen 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1336397.1 1 2 ORDER THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: January 24, 2017 THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05541-JST SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1336397.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?