Johnson v. CTF Soledad State Prison et al
Filing
6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James denying 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2017)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
CEDRIC CHESTER JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
Case No. 16-cv-05548-MEJ (PR)
v.
CTF SOLEDAD STATE PRISON, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL
Re: Dkt. No. 5
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Plaintiff has requested that counsel be appointed to assist him in this action. A district
12
court has the discretion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) to designate counsel to represent an indigent
13
civil litigant in exceptional circumstances. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th
14
Cir. 1986). This requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the
15
ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues
16
involved. See id. Neither of these factors is dispositive and both must be viewed together before
17
deciding on a request for counsel under § 1915(e)(1). Here, exceptional circumstances requiring
18
the appointment of counsel are not evident. The request for appointment of counsel is therefore
19
DENIED. The Court will consider appointment of counsel on its own motion, and seek volunteer
20
counsel to agree to represent plaintiff pro bono, if it determines at a later time in the proceedings
21
that appointment of counsel is warranted.
22
This order terminates Docket No. 5.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: January 10, 2017
25
26
27
28
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?