Teartt v. Colvin
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 3/31/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 3/20/2017. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
WILHEMINA TEARTT,
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 16-cv-05579-SK
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Defendant.
12
On September 30, 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint appealing the denial of social security
13
benefits. The Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, and the
14
defendant was served. On January 17, 2017, the Defendant filed an answer. Pursuant to the
15
Social Security Procedural Order filed in this action, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was
16
due to be filed by February 14, 2017. (See Dkt. 4.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed a motion for
17
summary judgment. Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this
18
case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff shall file a written response to this
19
Order to Show Cause by no later than March 31, 2017. If Plaintiff intends to file a motion for
20
summary judgment, she must show good cause for her failure to comply with the scheduling order
21
in this case. Plaintiff is admonished that if she fails to file a response to this Order to Show Cause
22
by March 31, 2017, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice without further notice to
23
Plaintiff.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 20, 2017
______________________________________
SALLIE KIM
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?