Teartt v. Colvin

Filing 14

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 3/31/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 3/20/2017. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILHEMINA TEARTT, Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 16-cv-05579-SK ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendant. 12 On September 30, 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint appealing the denial of social security 13 benefits. The Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, and the 14 defendant was served. On January 17, 2017, the Defendant filed an answer. Pursuant to the 15 Social Security Procedural Order filed in this action, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was 16 due to be filed by February 14, 2017. (See Dkt. 4.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed a motion for 17 summary judgment. Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this 18 case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff shall file a written response to this 19 Order to Show Cause by no later than March 31, 2017. If Plaintiff intends to file a motion for 20 summary judgment, she must show good cause for her failure to comply with the scheduling order 21 in this case. Plaintiff is admonished that if she fails to file a response to this Order to Show Cause 22 by March 31, 2017, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice without further notice to 23 Plaintiff. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 20, 2017 ______________________________________ SALLIE KIM United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?