Rana et al v. Gu et al

Filing 45

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER CONCERNING RETURN OF PLAINTIFFS' BOND. Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/12/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KYRA A. KAZANTZIS (SBN 154612 / kyrak@lawfoundation.org) DIANA E. CASTILLO (SBN 237281/ dianac@lawfoundation.org) NADIA AZIZ (SBN 252966/nadia.aziz@lawfoundation.org THOMAS P. ZITO (SBN 304629 / tom.zito@lawfoundation.org) FAIR HOUSING LAW PROJECT a project of the LAW FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY 152 North Third Street, Third Floor San Jose, California 95112 Telephone: (408) 280-2410 Facsimile: (408) 293-0106 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RANA KASHIF and SAIMA ANJUM 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 12 13 KASHIF RANA and SAIMA ANJUM Case No. 3:16-cv-5589-WHA Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 [PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER CONCERNING RETURN OF PLAINTIFFS’ BOND v. YOUXIN GU a/k/a CINDY GU and J.C. INVEST GROUP, INC. 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 [PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER CONCERNING RETURN OF PLAINTIFFS’ BOND The following order supplements the Court’s prior order authorizing return of Plaintiffs’ Bond (ECF 22 23 24 25 # 43). 1. The Bond of $2,000.00 lodged with the Court along with any accrued interest shall be returned to the Plaintiffs, payable to Kashif Rana and Saima Anjum. 26 27 28 1 of 3 [PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER CONCERNING RETURN OF PLAINTIFFS’ BOND Case No. 3:16-cv-5589-WHA 1 2. The Bond shall be mailed to the Plaintiffs at the offices of Plaintiffs’ counsel in the following 2 manner: 3 c/o Thomas Zito 4 Law Foundation of Silicon Valley 5 6 152 N. Third Street, 3rd Floor San Jose, CA 95112 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED 9 10 11 December 12 Dated:_________, 2016 _________________________________ HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 of 3 [PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER CONCERNING RETURN OF PLAINTIFFS’ BOND Case No. 3:16-cv-5589-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?