Rana et al v. Gu et al
Filing
45
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER CONCERNING RETURN OF PLAINTIFFS' BOND. Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/12/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KYRA A. KAZANTZIS (SBN 154612 / kyrak@lawfoundation.org)
DIANA E. CASTILLO (SBN 237281/ dianac@lawfoundation.org)
NADIA AZIZ (SBN 252966/nadia.aziz@lawfoundation.org
THOMAS P. ZITO (SBN 304629 / tom.zito@lawfoundation.org)
FAIR HOUSING LAW PROJECT a project of the
LAW FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY
152 North Third Street, Third Floor
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone: (408) 280-2410
Facsimile: (408) 293-0106
Attorneys for Plaintiffs RANA KASHIF and SAIMA ANJUM
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
12
13
KASHIF RANA and SAIMA ANJUM
Case No. 3:16-cv-5589-WHA
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER
CONCERNING RETURN OF PLAINTIFFS’
BOND
v.
YOUXIN GU a/k/a CINDY GU and J.C.
INVEST GROUP, INC.
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER CONCERNING RETURN OF PLAINTIFFS’ BOND
The following order supplements the Court’s prior order authorizing return of Plaintiffs’ Bond (ECF
22
23
24
25
# 43).
1. The Bond of $2,000.00 lodged with the Court along with any accrued interest shall be returned to the
Plaintiffs, payable to Kashif Rana and Saima Anjum.
26
27
28
1 of 3
[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER CONCERNING RETURN OF PLAINTIFFS’ BOND
Case No. 3:16-cv-5589-WHA
1
2. The Bond shall be mailed to the Plaintiffs at the offices of Plaintiffs’ counsel in the following
2
manner:
3
c/o Thomas Zito
4
Law Foundation of Silicon Valley
5
6
152 N. Third Street, 3rd Floor
San Jose, CA 95112
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED
9
10
11
December 12
Dated:_________, 2016
_________________________________
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 of 3
[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER CONCERNING RETURN OF PLAINTIFFS’ BOND
Case No. 3:16-cv-5589-WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?