Rana et al v. Gu et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER by Hon. William Alsup granting 47 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KYRA A. KAZANTZIS (SBN 154612 / [e-mail])
DIANA E. CASTILLO (SBN 237281/ [e-mail])
NADIA AZIZ (SBN 252966/[e-mail]
THOMAS P. ZITO (SBN 304629 / [e-mail])
FAIR HOUSING LAW PROJECT a project of the
LAW FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY
152 North Third Street, Third Floor
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs RANA KASHIF and SAIMA ANJUM

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

11
12

KASHIF RANA and SAIMA ANJUM
Case No. 3:16-cv-5589-WHA

13

Plaintiffs,

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

14
15
16

v.
YOUXIN GU a/k/a CINDY GU and J.C.
INVEST GROUP, INC.

17

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22

The parties have reached a settlement in this matter. Therefore, the parties hereby apply for and
stipulate to issuance of an order dismissing this action in its entirety, with the Court to retain jurisdiction over
this matter with regards to enforcing the terms of the settlement.
So stipulated.

23

Date: January 5, 2017
_/s/ Nadia Aziz
Nadia Aziz
Attorney for Plaintiffs

24
25
26

Date: January 5, 2017
/s/ Joe Bravo___
Joe Bravo
Attorney for Defendants

27
28

1 of 3

Order re

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
3:16-CV-5589-WHA

1
2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
3

I, Nadia Aziz, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the
4
5

signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 5, 2017, at San Jose, California.

6

______/s/_Nadia Aziz __
Nadia Aziz

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2 of 3

Order re

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
3:16-CV-5589-WHA

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

Based upon the foregoing application and stipulation and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered

4

that this action is dismissed in its entirety with the Court to retain jurisdiction to with regards to enforcing the

5

terms of the settlement.

6
7
8

January 9
Dated:_________, 2017

9

_________________________________
HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3 of 3

Order re

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
3:16-CV-5589-WHA