Corso v. Rejuvi Laboratory, Inc.

Filing 34

Notice of Reference and Order re Discovery Procedures; Order denying 31 Administrative Motion without prejudice. Joint letter due by 2/21/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/15/2017.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MARIA CORSO,

Case No. 16-cv-05604-MMC (DMR)

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

REJUVI LABORATORY, INC.,
Defendant.

Re: Dkt. No. 31

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
PROCEDURES; ORDER DENYING
MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

12
13
14

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
Defendant Rejuvi Laboratory, Inc. filed a discovery-related motion for administrative

15

relief. [Docket No. 31.] On February 13, 2017, the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney referred this

16

matter to the undersigned for resolution of the discovery motion and all discovery matters and

17

ordered the parties to meet and confer and submit a joint letter explaining the dispute. [Docket

18

No. 33.] Defendant’s motion for administrative relief is denied without prejudice. Any joint

19

letter regarding the instant discovery dispute shall be filed no later than February 21, 2017. The

20

parties may not incorporate by reference any portion of Defendant’s motion or Plaintiff Maria

21

Corso’s opposition thereto.

22

Going forward, the parties may seek judicial intervention in discovery disputes following

23

to the procedures in this order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Northern District of

24

California’s Local Rules, General Orders, and Standing Orders. Local rules, general orders,

25

standing orders, and instructions for using the Court's Electronic Case Filing system are available

26

at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Failure to comply may result in sanctions.

27
28

RESOLUTION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES
In order to respond to discovery disputes in a flexible, cost-effective and efficient manner,

the court uses the following procedure. The parties shall not file formal discovery motions.

2

Instead, as required by the federal and local rules, the parties shall first meet and confer to try to

3

resolve their disagreements. The meet and confer session must be in person or by telephone, and

4

may not be conducted by letter, e-mail, or fax. If disagreements remain, the parties shall file a

5

joint letter no later than five business days after the meet and confer session, unless otherwise

6

directed by the court. Lead trial counsel for both parties must sign the letter, which shall

7

include an attestation that the parties met and conferred in person or by telephone regarding all

8

issues prior to filing the letter. The letter must also include a paragraph listing relevant case

9

management deadlines, including (1) the fact and expert discovery cut-off dates; (2) the last day

10

to hear or file dispositive motions; (3) claim construction or class certification briefing deadlines

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

1

and hearing dates; and (4) pretrial conference and trial dates. Going issue-by-issue, the joint letter

12

shall describe each unresolved issue, summarize each party’s position with appropriate legal

13

authority, and provide each party’s final proposed compromise before moving to the next issue.

14

The joint letter shall not exceed five pages (12-point font or greater; margins no less than one

15

inch) without leave of court. Parties are expected to plan for and cooperate in preparing the

16

joint letter so that each side has adequate time to address the arguments. In the rare instance

17

that a joint letter is not possible, each side may submit a letter not to exceed two pages, which

18

shall include an explanation of why a joint letter was not possible. The parties shall submit one

19

exhibit that sets forth each disputed discovery request in full, followed immediately by the

20

objections and/or responses thereto. No other information shall be included in the exhibit. No

21

other exhibits shall be submitted without prior court approval. The court will review the

22

submission(s) and determine whether formal briefing or proceedings are necessary. Discovery

23

letter briefs must be e-filed under the Civil Events category of Motions and Related Filings >

24

Motions - General > “Discovery Letter Brief.”

25

All exhibits to discovery disputes should be separately filed on ECF (for example, if the

26

motion is Docket No. 30, and the declaration with 10 exhibits is Docket No. 31, Exhibit A would

27

be filed as Docket No. 31-1, Exhibit B would be Docket No. 31-2, and so on). All exhibits shall

28

also be filed in a searchable OCR format where possible.
2

1

The court has found that it is often efficient and beneficial for counsel to appear in person

2

at discovery hearings. This provides the opportunity to engage counsel, where appropriate, in

3

resolving aspects of the discovery dispute while remaining available to rule on disputes that

4

counsel are not able to resolve themselves. For this reason, the court expects counsel to appear

5

in person. Permission to attend by telephone may be granted upon written request made at least

6

one week in advance of the hearing if the court determines that good cause exists to excuse

7

personal attendance, and that personal attendance is not needed in order to have an effective

8

discovery hearing. The facts establishing good cause must be set forth in the request.

9

In emergencies during discovery events (such as depositions), any party may, after exhausting
good faith attempts to resolve disputed issues, seek judicial intervention pursuant to Civil L.R. 37-

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

1(b) by contacting the court through the courtroom deputy. If the court is unavailable, the

12

discovery event shall proceed with objections noted for the record.
MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL

13
14

Parties are reminded that court proceedings are presumptively public, and no document

15

shall be filed under seal without request for a court order that is narrowly tailored to cover only the

16

document, the particular portion of the document, or category of documents for which good cause

17

exists for filing under seal. If a party wishes to file a document under seal, that party shall first file

18

an administrative motion to seal in accordance with Local Rule 79-5.

19

The parties need not file paper copies of the administrative motion to seal with the clerk’s

20

office. The parties only need to submit chambers copies of the administrative motion to seal and

21

related filings. Chambers copies should include all material — both redacted and unredacted —

22

so that the chambers staff does not have to re-assemble the whole brief or declaration, although

23

chambers copies should clearly delineate which portions are confidential (via highlighting).

24

Chambers copies with confidential materials will be handled like all other chambers copies of

25

materials without special restriction, and will typically be recycled, not shredded. If the parties

26

wish to dispose of documents filed under seal in some other way, they must expressly indicate as

27

much in their sealing motion and make arrangements to pick up the documents upon disposition of

28

the motion.
3

PROTECTIVE ORDERS

1
2

If parties believe a protective order is necessary, they shall, where practicable, use one of

3

the model stipulated protective orders (available at http://cand.uscourts.gov/model-protective-

4

orders). Parties shall file one of the following with their proposed protective order: (a) a

5

declaration stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders except for the

6

addition of case-identifying information or the elimination of language denoted as optional; (b) a

7

declaration explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version

8

comparing the proposed protective order with the model order; or (c) a declaration explaining why

9

use of one of the model orders is not practicable.
CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7) and 5-2(b), parties must lodge an extra paper copy of

12

certain filings and mark it as a copy for “Chambers.” All chambers copies should be double-sided

13

(when possible), three-hole punched along the left side of the page, and should bear the ECF filing

14

“stamp” (case number, docket number, date, and ECF page number) along the top of the page. All

15

exhibits shall be clearly delineated with labels along the right side. If the filing includes exhibits

16

over two inches thick, the parties shall place the chambers copy in a binder.

17

Any stipulation or proposed order submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted by

18

email to [e-mail] as a word processing attachment on the same day the

19

document is e-filed. This address should only be used for this stated purpose unless otherwise

20

directed by the court.

21
22

PRIVILEGE LOGS
If a party withholds responsive information by claiming that it is privileged or otherwise

23

protected from discovery, that party shall produce a privilege log as quickly as possible, but no

24

later than fourteen days after its disclosures or discovery responses are due, unless the parties

25

stipulate to or the court sets another date. Privilege logs must be sufficiently detailed for the

26

opposing party to assess whether the assertion of privilege is justified. Unless the parties agree to

27

alternative logging methods, the log should include: (a) the title and description of the document,

28

including number of pages or Bates-number range; (b) the subject matter addressed in the
4

1

document; (c) the identity and position of its author(s); (d) the identity and position of all

2

addressees and recipients; (e) the date the document was prepared and, if different, the date(s) on

3

which it was sent to or shared with persons other than its author(s); and (f) the specific basis for

4

the claim that the document is privileged or protected.

5

Communications involving trial counsel that post-date the filing of the complaint need not

6

be placed on a privilege log. Failure to promptly furnish a privilege log may be deemed a waiver

7

of the privilege or protection.

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 15, 2017
______________________________________
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5