Glassey et al v. The United Kingdom et.al.
Filing
93
ORDER DENYING 85 MOTION TO UN-RELATE CASES by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
TODD S. GLASSEY and MICHAEL E.
MCNEIL,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
No. C 16-05606 WHA
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO UN-RELATE CASES
THE UNITED KINGDOM, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
The Court has considered plaintiffs’ “administrative motion to rescind related case
18
association order” (Dkt. No. 85) — essentially a motion to undo the undersigned’s prior order
19
relating this matter to Glassey v. Microsemi, Case No. 3:14-cv-03629-WHA (see Dkt. No. 73)
20
— and the Apple defendants’ opposition thereto. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 23, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?