Glassey et al v. The United Kingdom

Filing 93

ORDER DENYING 85 MOTION TO UN-RELATE CASES by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 TODD S. GLASSEY and MICHAEL E. MCNEIL, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 No. C 16-05606 WHA v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO UN-RELATE CASES THE UNITED KINGDOM, et al., Defendants. / 16 17 The Court has considered plaintiffs’ “administrative motion to rescind related case 18 association order” (Dkt. No. 85) — essentially a motion to undo the undersigned’s prior order 19 relating this matter to Glassey v. Microsemi, Case No. 3:14-cv-03629-WHA (see Dkt. No. 73) 20 — and the Apple defendants’ opposition thereto. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 23, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?