Glassey et al v. The United Kingdom et.al.
Filing
98
ORDER DENYING 89 "SERVICE CONFIRMATION AND GUIDANCE MOTION" by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2017)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
TODD S. GLASSEY and MICHAEL E.
MCNEIL,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
No. C 16-05606 WHA
v.
ORDER DENYING “SERVICE
CONFIRMATION AND
GUIDANCE MOTION”
THE UNITED KINGDOM, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
Plaintiffs filed a “LR-7-11 Motion Plaintiffs Service Confirmation and Guidance
18
Motion” also described as “Plaintiffs Motion for Guidance in Service to Nation-States and
19
finding that Service to Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Microsemi is complete” (Dkt.
20
No. 89). The Court has considered plaintiffs’ motion, to the extent it is comprehensible, and the
21
Apple defendants’ opposition thereto. The motion is DENIED.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 24, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
