Albert Dytch v. The Guzman Corporation et al

Filing 20

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 19 Stipulation for dismissal without prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Albert Dytch

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALBERT DYTCH,

12
13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
vs.
THE GUZMAN CORPORATION dba LA
PINATA #1, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:16-cv-05624-HSG
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
ORDER

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Albert Dytch and Defendants

2

The Guzman Corporation dba La Pinata #1 and Alicia Guzman, Trustee of the Francisco Javier

3

and Alicia Guzman Revocable Living Trust, dated August 5, 2004, the parties to this action, by

4

and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

5

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed without prejudice.

6

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendants that the Parties have

7

entered into a Stipulated Judgment, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” which provides for

8

judgment to be entered in Plaintiff’s favor in the event that Defendants default on their

9

obligations under the Parties’ settlement agreement. The Parties request that the Court retain

10

jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Stipulated Judgment under the authority of Kokkonen v.

11

Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

12
13

Dated: February 27, 2017

MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

14
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Albert Dytch

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Dated: February 27, 2017

GHANTOUS LAW CORPORATION
/s/ Karyne T. Ghantous
Karyne T. Ghantous
Attorneys for Defendants,
The Guzman Corporation dba La Pinata #1 and
Alicia Guzman, Trustee of the Francisco Javier and
Alicia Guzman Revocable Living Trust, dated
August 5, 2004

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2

1

ORDER

2
3

The parties having so stipulated,

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The Court

5

will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Stipulated Judgment under the authority of

6

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11

Dated: February 28, 2017
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 3