Savin v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 109

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 108 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (Amended Stipulated Protective Order) filed by Regents of the University of California. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 14, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

Michael A. Laurenson (SBN 190023)
Sara A. Moore (SBN 294255)
GORDON REES SCULLY
MANSUKHANI, LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

Lisa Barnett Sween (SBN 191155)
Stephanie T. Yang (SBN 280006)
Amelia Sanchez-Moran (SBN 281219)
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
50 California Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4615
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Cross-Defendant
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA

Attorneys for Defendant
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC
ARCHBISHOP OF SAN FRANCISCO, A
Corporation Sole (erroneously sued as
ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO)

Paul E. Gaspari (SBN 76496)
Daniel C. Zamora (SBN 224375)
WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK
COLEMAN GRODIN LAW
CORPORATION
475 Sansome Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
YVONNE MERÉ, State Bar #173594
Chief of Complex and
Affirmative Litigation
KENNETH M. WALCZAK, State Bar
#247389
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza, 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
FATHER BRUCE LERY

17

Attorneys for Defendant/
Third-Party Plaintiff
CITY AND COUNTY OF
SAN FRANCISCO

18
19
20
21
22
23

David M. Poore (SBN 192541)
Scott A. Brown (SBN 177099)
BROWN POORE LLP
1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 420
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 925.955.8600
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

24
25

Attorneys for Plaintiff
KATHERINE SAVIN

26
27
28
-1STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST
MAST

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO

3
4

Plaintiff,

5
6
7
8
9

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

KATHARINE SAVIN,

vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO;
ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO;
FATHER BRUCE LERY; HEATHER
HARRIS, M.D.; ANNE KINDERMAN, M.D.;
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
_______________________________________

10
AND RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINTS.
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

11
12

1.

Case No. 3:16-CV-05627 JST
AMENDED STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Complaint Filed: October 4, 2016

)

PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

13

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of

14

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public

15

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.

16

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following

17

Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket

18

protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from

19

public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to

20

confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as

21

set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file

22

confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be

23

followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to

24

file material under seal.

25

2.

26
27

DEFINITIONS
2.1

Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of

information or items under this Order.

28
2
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

2.2

“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is

2

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule

3

of Civil Procedure 26(c).

4
5
6
7
8
9

2.3

Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as

well as their support staff).
2.4

Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that

it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.5

Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the

medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,
testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

10

responses to discovery in this matter.

12

2.6

Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent

13

to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as

14

a consultant in this action.

15
16
17
18
19

2.7

House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House

Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
2.8

Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other

legal entity not named as a Party to this action.
2.9

Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this

20

action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this

21

action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of

22

that party.

23
24
25
26
27
28

2.10

Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,

consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).
2.11

Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this action.
2.12

Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services

(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and
3
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and

2

subcontractors.

3
4

2.13

Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as

“CONFIDENTIAL.”

5

2.14

Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a

6

Producing Party.

7

3.

8
9

SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material

(as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2)
all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony,

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

10

conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

12

However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following

13

information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a

14

Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as

15

a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the

16

public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party

17

prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who

18

obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating

19

Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.

20

4.

DURATION

21

Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by

22

this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court

23

order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all

24

claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after

25

the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this

26

action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time

27

pursuant to applicable law.

28
4
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1
2

5.

DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1

Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party

3

or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care

4

to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.

5

The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents,

6

items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material,

7

documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept

8

unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

9

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are
shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

10

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary

12

expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. If it comes to

13

a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not

14

qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is

15

withdrawing the mistaken designation.

16

5.2

Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order

17

(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,

18

Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so

19

designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

20

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

21

(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but

22

excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing

23

Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains protected material. If only

24

a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also

25

must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

26

margins). A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for

27

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated

28

which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the
5
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed

2

“CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and

3

produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for

4

protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing

5

Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL” legend to each page that contains Protected Material. If

6

only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party

7

also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

8

margins).
(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the

10

Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

9

proceeding, all protected testimony.

12

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other

13

tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the

14

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend

15

“CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection,

16

the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).

17

5.3

Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to

18

designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s

19

right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a

20

designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is

21

treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

22

6.

23

CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1

Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of

24

confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality

25

designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic

26

burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to

27

challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the

28

original designation is disclosed.
6
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

6.2

Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution

2

process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis

3

for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written

4

notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this

5

specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in

6

good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other

7

forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In

8

conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality

9

designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the
designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered,

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

10

to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next

12

stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or

13

establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in

14

a timely manner.

15

6.3

Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court

16

intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under

17

Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) within 21 days

18

of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and

19

confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such motion must be

20

accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet

21

and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by the Designating Party to

22

make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 14 days, if applicable)

23

shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. In

24

addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation at

25

any time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to the designation of a

26

deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must

27

be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the

28

meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.
7
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating

2

Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose

3

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to

4

sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to

5

file a motion to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the

6

material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s

7

designation until the court rules on the challenge.

8

7.

9

ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1

Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed

or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

10

prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be

12

disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order.

13

When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of

14

section 13 below (FINAL DISPOSITION).

15

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and

16

in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

17

7.2

Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise

18

ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may

19

disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

20

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees

21

of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information

22

for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that

23

is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

24

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving

25

Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the

26

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

27
28

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is
reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and
8
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

2

(d) the court and its personnel;

3

(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and

4

Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who

5

have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

6

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably

7

necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit

8

A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of

9

transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be
separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

10

under this Stipulated Protective Order.

12

(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or

13

other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

14

8.

PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER

15

LITIGATION

16

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels

17

disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that

18

Party must:

19
20

(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a
copy of the subpoena or court order;

21

(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the

22

other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this

23

Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and

24
25
26

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the
Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the

27

subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as

28

“CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order
9
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party

2

shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material –

3

and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving

4

Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

5

9.

A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS

6

LITIGATION

7

(a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in this

8

action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in

9

connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order.
Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

10

additional protections.

12

(b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a Non-

13

Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with

14

the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall:

15
16
17

(1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or all of
the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party;
(2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order in this

18

litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the

19

information requested; and

20

(3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.

21

(c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court within 14

22

days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce

23

the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party

24

timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its

25

possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a

26

determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the

27

burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

28
10
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

10.

2

UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

3

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective

4

Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the

5

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the

6

Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were

7

made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the

8

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

9

11.

INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED
MATERIAL

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

10

When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently

12

produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the

13

Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This

14

provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery

15

order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of

16

Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a

17

communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product

18

protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order

19

submitted to the court.

20

12.

21
22
23

MISCELLANEOUS
12.1

Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to

seek its modification by the court in the future.
12.2

Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective

24

Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any

25

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly,

26

no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material

27

covered by this Protective Order.

28
11
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

12.3

Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party

or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in

3

the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any

4

Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be

5

filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected

6

Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a

7

request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade

8

secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file

9

Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) is denied by the court, then

10

the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

2

79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by the court.

12

13.

13

FINAL DISPOSITION
Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each

14

Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such

15

material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,

16

compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected

17

Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must

18

submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the

19

Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all

20

the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has

21

not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or

22

capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to

23

retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts,

24

legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work

25

product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected

26

Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to

27

this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).

28
12
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD:

2

Dated: November 13, 2017

GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP

3
4

By:

/s/ Michael A. Laurenson
Michael A. Laurenson
Sara A. Moore
Attorneys for Cross Defendant
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA

By:

/s/ David M. Poore
David M. Poore
Scott A. Brown
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KATHERINE SAVIN

By:

/s/ Daniel C. Zamora_______________ ________
Paul E. Gaspari
Daniel C. Zamora
Attorneys for Defendant
FATHER BRUCE LERY

5
6
7
8
9
10

Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

11
12
13
14

DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
KENNETH M. WALCZAK
Deputy City Attorney

15
16

18

_/s/ Kenneth M. Walczak
Kenneth M. Walczak
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

19

JACKSON LEWIS, P.C.

17

20

By:

By:

21
22
23
24
25

/s/ Lisa Barnett Sween _______________________
Lisa Barnett Sween
Stephanie T. Yang
Attorneys for Defendant
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF
SAN FRANCISCO, a corporation sole
(erroneously sued as the ARCHDIOCESE OF
SAN FRANCISCO)

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27

November 14, 2017
DATED: ________________________

_____________________________________
United States District Judge

28
13
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST

1

EXHIBIT A

2

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

3

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _________________

4

[print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and

5

understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for

6

the Northern District of California on [date] in the case of ___________ [insert formal name of

7

the case and the number and initials assigned to it by the court]. I agree to comply with and

8

to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and

9

acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the
nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or

11
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

10

item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict

12

compliance with the provisions of this Order.

13

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the

14

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated

15

Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

16

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of

17

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone

18

number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any

19

proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.

20
21

Date: ______________________________________

22

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

23
24

Printed name: _______________________________

25
26

Signature: __________________________________

27
28
14
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-05627-JST