Savin v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 87

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 86 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Katharine Savin. Case Management Statement due by 7/3/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/12/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 6, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Lisa Barnett Sween (SBN 191155)
Stephanie T. Yang (SBN 280006)
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
50 California Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4615
Telephone
415.394.9400
Facsimile
415.394.9401
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Michael A. Laurenson (SBN 190023)
Sara A. Moore (SBN 294255)
GORDON & REES
SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP
275 Battery St., Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone
415.986.5900
Facsimile
415.986.8054
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP
OF SAN FRANCISCO, A Corporation Sole
(erroneously sued as the ARCHDIOCESE OF
SAN FRANCISCO)

Attorneys for Cross-Defendant
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA

Paul E. Gaspari, (SBN 76496)
Daniel C. Zamora (SBN 224375)
WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK
COLEMAN GRODIN law corporation
475 Sansome Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone
415.433.1400
Facsimile
415.433.3883
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Attorneys for Defendant
FATHER BRUCE LERY
DENNIS J. HERRERA (SBN 139669)
City Attorney
KENNETH M. WALCZAK (SBN 247389)
Deputy City Attorney
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Fox Plaza, 1390 Market Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

David M. Poore (SBN 192541)
Scott A. Brown (SBN 177099)
BROWN POORE LLP
1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 420
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 925.955.8600
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KATHERINE SAVIN
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. 3:16-cv-5627 JST

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KATHERINE SAVIN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

Case No. 3:16-CV-05627-JST
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN
FRANCISCO; FATHER BRUCE LERY;
HEATHER HARRIS, M.D.; ANNE
KINDERMAN, M.D.; and DOES 1 through
10, inclusive,

Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Complaint Filed: October 4, 2016
Trial Date:
None Set

17
Defendants.
18
_____________________________________
19
AND RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINTS
20
21

Plaintiff KATHERINE SAVIN (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF

22

SAN FRANCISCO, THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SAN FRANCISCO, A

23

Corporation Sole (erroneously sued as the ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO) (“ASF”),

24

FATHER BRUCE LERY, and Cross-Defendant REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

25

CALIFORNIA (“Regents”) by and through their counsel of record, jointly enter into the following

26

stipulation:

27
28

WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) is currently scheduled for June
14, 2017.
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. 3:16-cv-5627 JST

1

WHEREAS, the parties agree and stipulate that good cause exists to continue the existing

2

CMC for a period of approximately 30 days, as (1) Plaintiff’s lead trial counsel, David M. Poore is

3

not available on June 14, 2017, as he will be out of the state on a pre-paid vacation, with limited

4

email and telephone access; (2) Defendant Father Lery’s status as a party in this action remains

5

uncertain, as his Motion to Dismiss is pending for a ruling; and (3) there remains a question as to

6

the proper service of Defendants Harris and Kinderman, who are physicians with the Regents.

7

Defendants Harris and Kinderman have not yet appeared in the action, and the parties are presently

8

meeting and conferring about whether or not they have been properly served. The parties

9

respectfully request a continuance of the CMC, so that all lead trial counsel can attend, and the

10

parties can finalize any service issues with respect to the individual Defendants.

11

As Counsel for Defendant City and County of San Francisco has a trial that is set to begin

12

on July 17, 2017, the parties respectfully request a CMC hearing date of July 12, 2017, if possible.

13

THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate that the Case Management Conference be

14

continued from June 14, 2017, to July 12, 2017 (or as soon thereafter as the Court may deem

15

proper).

16
17
18

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 2, 2017

JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
By:

__/s/ Lisa Barnett Sween____________________
Lisa Barnett Sween
Stephanie T. Yang
Attorneys for Defendant
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF
SAN FRANCISCO, a corporation sole (erroneously
sued as the ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN
FRANCISCO)

By:

_/s/ David M. Poore ________________ _______
David M. Poore
Scott A. Brown
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KATHERINE SAVIN

By:

_/s/ Paul E. Gaspari______________ __________
Paul E. Gaspari
Daniel C. Zamora
Attorneys for Defendant
FATHER BRUCE LERY

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. 3:16-cv-5627 JST

1
2

DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
KENNETH M. WALCZAK
Deputy City Attorney

3
4
By:

_/s// Kenneth M. Walczak__________________
Kenneth M. Walczak
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

By:

/s/ Michael A. Laurenson
Michael A. Laurenson
Attorneys for Cross Defendant
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) ATTESTATION

13

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each

14

of the other signatories to this document.

15

DATED: June 2, 2017

By:

16

/s/David M. Poore
DAVID M. POORE
Attorney for Plaintiff

17
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER

19
20

GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, the Stipulation is GRANTED.

21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the CMC hearing date of June 14, 2017, be continued to
22
July

, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.

23
SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: June , 2017

___________________________________

26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
4
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. 3:16-cv-5627 JST