Mazzaferro v. Parisi et al

Filing 101

Order by Hon. William Alsup granting 100 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BRUCE D. GOLDSTEIN #135970 County Counsel JOSHUA A. MYERS #250988 Deputy County Counsel County of Sonoma 575 Administration Drive, Room 105A Santa Rosa, California 95403 Telephone: (707) 565-2421 Facsimile: (707) 565-2624 E-mail: joshua.myers@sonoma-county.org Attorneys for Defendants Ken Johnson and Spencer Crum 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. CV-16-5641-WA RONALD MAZZAFERRO, 13 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR SONOMA COUNTY DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 WILLIAM PARISI, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 / Defendants Ken Johnson, Spencer Crum, Bruce D. Goldstein, and Joshua A. 19 Myers (hereinafter “Sonoma County Defendants”), and Plaintiff Ronald Mazzaferro 20 (collectively, the “parties”) hereby stipulate that the Sonoma County Defendants may file 21 their response to Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint on or before August 10, 2017. 22 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties believe that no court order is necessary 23 for this stipulation because it only involves extending the time for the Sonoma County 24 Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint and such an extension of 25 time will not affect any events or deadlines already fixed by the court. 26 In an abundance of caution, however, the parties have included a proposed order 27 regarding this stipulation in the event the Court determines that this request is more 28 properly governed by Local Rule 6-1(b). Stip & Proposed Order re Ext of Time 1 CV-16-5641-WA BACKGROUND FOR STIPULATION 1 On or about July 7, 2017, the Court entered an Order entitled “Order Denying 2 3 Motion to Dismiss, Granting Motion for a More Definite Statement, and Vacating 4 Hearing.” (Dkt. #92.) In that Order, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a fourth amended 5 complaint by July 20, 2017, at noon. (Id., at pg. 4, lines 12-13.) If Plaintiff files a fourth 6 amended complaint by noon on July 20, 2017, and if the fourth amended complaint 7 alleges causes of action against any of the Sonoma County Defendants, then their 8 response would be due on or about August 3, 2017, or 14 days after Plaintiff files his 9 fourth amended complaint. (FRCP, Rule 15(a)(3).) 10 Undersigned counsel for Defendants Ken Johnson and Spencer Crum has a pre- 11 planned vacation from July 20, 2017 through July 31, 2017. Counsel will not return to 12 his office until August 1, 2017. Counsel will likely not have sufficient time to prepare a 13 response to Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint by August 3, 2017, assuming Plaintiff 14 continues to make claims against the Sonoma County Defendants. STIPULATION 15 Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties stipulate and agree that if 16 17 Plaintiff files a fourth amended complaint by noon on July 20, 2017, and if that fourth 18 amended complaint raises claims against any or all of the Sonoma County Defendants, 19 then the Sonoma County Defendants will have up to and including August 10, 2017, to 20 file and serve a response to Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 21 5-1(i)(3), Plaintiff has given counsel for Defendants Ken Johnson and Spencer Crum 22 permission to file this document which indicates his concurrence in the filing. Counsel 23 for Defendants Ken Johnson and Spencer Crum and Plaintiff believe this extension of 24 time will not affect any court events or deadlines. 25 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), the parties request the Court enter the following 26 proposed order approving this stipulation if the Court believes a court order approving 27 this stipulation is necessary. 28 //// Stip & Proposed Order re Ext of Time 2 CV-16-5641-WA 1 Dated: July 18, 2017 BRUCE D. GOLDSTEIN, County Counsel 2 By: /s/ Joshua A. Myers Joshua A. Myers Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendants Ken Johnson & Spencer Crum 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: July 18, 2017 _____/s/___________________ Ronald Mazzaferro, in pro per 8 9 10 11 ******* 12 13 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 15 16 July 21 Dated: _____________, 2017. _____________________________ Hon. William Alsup United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip & Proposed Order re Ext of Time 3 CV-16-5641-WA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?