Mazzaferro v. Parisi et al
Filing
37
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/17/17. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/17/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dl, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
RONALD MAZZAFERRO,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
No. C 16-05641 WHA
v.
13
WILLIAM PARISI, et al.,
14
Defendants.
/
15
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff’s responses to the pending motions to dismiss were due on February 8 and
17
February 9, respectively. Now, more than one week later, no response has been filed. By
18
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23 AT NOON, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action
19
should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff’s submission must include his
20
response to the pending motions his response to the pending motions and a sworn statement
21
justifying his failure to respond. Failure to timely respond or to show adequate cause for the
22
delay may result in dismissal.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: February 17, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?