Mazzaferro v. Parisi et al

Filing 37

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/17/17. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/17/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dl, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RONALD MAZZAFERRO, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Plaintiff, No. C 16-05641 WHA v. 13 WILLIAM PARISI, et al., 14 Defendants. / 15 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff’s responses to the pending motions to dismiss were due on February 8 and 17 February 9, respectively. Now, more than one week later, no response has been filed. By 18 THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23 AT NOON, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action 19 should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff’s submission must include his 20 response to the pending motions his response to the pending motions and a sworn statement 21 justifying his failure to respond. Failure to timely respond or to show adequate cause for the 22 delay may result in dismissal. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 17, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?