Barker v. Chanault et al.,

Filing 101

ORDER REQUIRING DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF EXHIBITS TO OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/24/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KENNETH BARKER, 10 Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 12 13 v. ORDER REQUIRING DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF EXHIBITS TO OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, Defendant. / 14 15 No. C 16-05647 WHA On August 7, plaintiff Kenneth Barker submitted an opposition to defendant American 16 Express Company’s motion for summary judgment. Barker appended 14 separate exhibits to 17 that motion. He did not, however, submit a sworn declaration authenticating any of these 18 exhibits as required under FRCP 56 (see, e.g., Dkt. No. 94-1). Barker SHALL SUBMIT a sworn 19 declaration by no later than WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30 authenticating each of these exhibits to 20 the extent that he can honestly do so. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: August 24, 2017. 25 WILLIAM ALSUP 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?