Cruz v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 48

*****FILED IN ERROR; DISREGARD. See 49 .***** (whalc2, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DIVINIA CRUZ, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 No. C 16-05676 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. / 16 17 The pro hac vice application of Attorney Ellen Silverman (Dkt. No. 47) is DENIED for 18 failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. That rule requires an applicant to certify that “he or 19 she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest 20 court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphases added). 21 Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it identifies only the 22 state of bar membership — e.g., “the bar of Minnesota” — is inadequate under the rule because 23 it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the 24 application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: December 21, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?