Cruz v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
*****FILED IN ERROR; DISREGARD. See 49 .***** (whalc2, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 16-05676 WHA
ORDER DENYING PRO
HAC VICE APPLICATION
SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,
The pro hac vice application of Attorney Ellen Silverman (Dkt. No. 47) is DENIED for
failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. That rule requires an applicant to certify that “he or
she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest
court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphases added).
Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it identifies only the
state of bar membership — e.g., “the bar of Minnesota” — is inadequate under the rule because
it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the
application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 21, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?