Jugoz v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
61
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS. The May 19, 2017, hearing on Credit One's motion to dismiss is vacated, without prejudice to Credit One's renoticing the motion in the event the settlement is not effectuated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 05/15/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2017)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RUDOLPH JUGOZ,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
v.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,
Case No. 16-cv-05687-MMC
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON
DEFENDANT CREDIT ONE BANK,
N.A.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 46, 60
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
Before the Court is a notice of settlement, filed by plaintiff Rudolph Jugoz on May
14
12, 2017, advising the Court that “a settlement has been reached” between plaintiff and
15
defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”) and that “[t]he parties anticipate finalizing
16
the settlement and stipulating to a dismissal within the next 40 days.” (Not. Settlement,
17
filed May 12, 2017, at 1:20-22.)
18
In light of such settlement, the May 19, 2017, hearing on Credit One’s motion to
19
dismiss is hereby VACATED, without prejudice to Credit One’s renoticing the motion in
20
the event the settlement is not effectuated.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 15, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?