Jugoz v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 61

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS. The May 19, 2017, hearing on Credit One's motion to dismiss is vacated, without prejudice to Credit One's renoticing the motion in the event the settlement is not effectuated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 05/15/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RUDOLPH JUGOZ, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Case No. 16-cv-05687-MMC ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. Nos. 46, 60 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is a notice of settlement, filed by plaintiff Rudolph Jugoz on May 14 12, 2017, advising the Court that “a settlement has been reached” between plaintiff and 15 defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”) and that “[t]he parties anticipate finalizing 16 the settlement and stipulating to a dismissal within the next 40 days.” (Not. Settlement, 17 filed May 12, 2017, at 1:20-22.) 18 In light of such settlement, the May 19, 2017, hearing on Credit One’s motion to 19 dismiss is hereby VACATED, without prejudice to Credit One’s renoticing the motion in 20 the event the settlement is not effectuated. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 15, 2017 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?