Howard Rydolph v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER APPROVING 50 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WEBBANK WITH PREJUDICE by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981)
ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326)
JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542)
SAGARIA LAW, P.C.
2033 Gateway Place, 6th Floor
San Jose, CA 95110
408-279-2288 ph: 408-279-2299 fax
Attorneys for Plaintiff

6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

8
9

HOWARD RYDOLPH,

10

Plaintiff,

11

14

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT
WEBBANK; PROPOSED ORDER

v.

12
13

Case No.: 3:16-CV-05694-WHA

EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.; et. al.,

15
16

Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

22

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Howard Rydolph and defendant

23

WebBank, that WebBank be dismissed from this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules

24

of Civil Procedure, section 41(a)(2), and that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and

25

costs.

26

//

27

//

28

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT WEBBANK; PROPOSED ORDER - 1

1

DATED: January 18, 2017

Sagaria Law, P.C.
By:

/s/ Elliot W. Gale
Elliot W. Gale
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Howard Rydolph

2
3
4
5
6

DATED: January 18, 2017

Doll Amir and Eley LLP

7

By:

8

/s/ Chelsea Diaz
Chelsea Diaz
Attorneys for Defendant
WebBank

9
10
11
12
13

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this

14

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Chelsea Diaz has concurred in this filing.

15

/s/ Elliot Gale

16
17

[PROPOSED] ORDER

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Defendant WebBank is dismissed with
prejudice as to plaintiff's claims only (i.e., without prejudice to any potential cross-claims that
might possibly be asserted later by co-defendants against WebBank).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 19, 2017.

25

William H. Alsup

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT WEBBANK; PROPOSED ORDER - 2