Sato v. Equifax, Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER granting 38 STIPULATION for dismissal of Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/04/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Scott J. Sagaria (SBN 217981) Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326) Joe Angelo (SBN 268542) SAGARIA LAW, P.C. 2033 Gateway Pl., 5th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 Telephone: (408) 279-2288 Facsimile: (408) 297-2299 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGGIE SATO, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 Case No.: 3:16-cv-05702-WHO EQUIFAX, INC., et al, 15 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC; ORDER Defendants. 16 17 18 19 TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES: 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Reggie Sato and defendant 21 Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC that Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC be dismissed from this 22 action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), and that 23 each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC; ORDER -1- 1 Sagaria Law, P.C. DATED: April 25, 2017 By: 2 3 /s/ Elliot Gale Elliot Gale Attorney for Plaintiff Reggie Sato 4 5 The Ryan Firm DATED: April 25, 2017 6 By: 7 8 /s/ Timothy Matthew Ryan Timothy Matthew Ryan Attorney for Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC 9 10 I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 11 Stipulation. I hereby attest that Timothy Matthew Ryan has concurred in this filing. 12 13 /s/ Elliot Gale 14 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 23 24 25 DATED: May 4, 2017 Hon. William H. Orrick UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC; ORDER -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?