Rubirosa Vizcaino v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
29
ORDER Denying 20 Motion to Consolidate. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/31/17. (tehlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2017)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
RUBIROSA VIZCAINO,
Plaintiff,
5
6
7
8
v.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Case No. 16-cv-05703-TEH
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
CONSOLIDATE
Defendant.
9
10
Before the Court is Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s (“Experian”) Motion to
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Consolidate filed on December 22, 2016. Experian seeks to consolidate more than 170
12
suits filed by Plaintiff’s counsel and assigned to different judges in this district.
13
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42 permits a court to consolidate actions if they
14
“involve a common question of law or fact.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 42. The district court has
15
broad discretion to decide whether consolidation is appropriate. Inv’rs Research Co. v.
16
U.S. Dist. Court for Cent. Dist .of California, 877 F.2d 777, 777 (9th Cir.1989).
17
This Court joins other judges in the Northern District of California in DENYING
18
Experian’s request for consolidation. See e.g., Mamisay v. Experian Info. Sols., Inc.,
19
No. 4:16-cv-05684-YGR (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2017); Gonzalez v. Experian Info. Sols., Inc.,
20
et al, No. 3:16-cv-05678-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2017). First, the Court does not have the
21
authority to consolidate cases not before it. See General Order No. 44(B) (granting the
22
Court’s Executive Committee the power to review assignment orders). Second, any
23
efficiency gained by consolidation would be outweighed by the delay and undue burden
24
resulting from assignment of over a hundred cases to a single judge.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: 01/31/17
28
_____________________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?