Miller v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #18 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER Extending time to File Responsive Pleading filed by Ditech Financial, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 31, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

LOCKE LORD LLP
Regina J. McClendon (SBN 184669)
[e-mail]
Xiyi Fu (SBN 278274)
[e-mail]
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Ditech Financial LLC

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100
San Francisco, CA 94104

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

JOSEPH MILLER,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; Equifax, Inc.; )
)
Real Time Resolutions; USAA Federal Savings
Bank; Ditech Financial, LLC and DOES 1 through )
)
100 inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

CASE NO.: 4:16-cv-05710-JST
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE
DEADLINE

Complaint Filed: October 5, 2016

20
Defendant Ditech Financial LLC (“Ditech”) and plaintiff Joseph Miller (“Plaintiff”), by and

21
22

through their respective counsel of record, jointly stipulate and agree as follows:
RECITALS

23
24

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint on October 5, 2016;

25

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Ditech on October 11, 2016;

26

WHEREAS, Ditech’s current deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is November 1,

27
28

2016;
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to explore potential resolution to the litigation;
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Miller v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:16-cv-05710-JST

1

STIPULATION

2

WHEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree:

3

Ditech’s deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to December 31, 2016.

4
5

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

6

Dated: October 28, 2016

LOCKE LORD LLP

7
8

By:

/s/ Xiyi Fu
Regina J. McClendon
Xiyi Fu
Attorneys for Defendant Ditech Financial LLC

9
10
11

Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100
San Francisco, CA 94104

12

Dated: October 28, 2016

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

13
14

By:

/s/ Elliot Gale
Elliot Gale
Attorney for Plaintiff Joseph Miller

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Miller v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:16-cv-05710-JST

1
2
3

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that she has obtained concurrence
regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document.
Dated: October 28, 2016

/s/ Xiyi Fu_________
Xiyi Fu

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100
San Francisco, CA 94104

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Miller v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:16-cv-05710-JST

1
2
3
4

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Good cause appearing, the deadline for defendant Ditech Financial LLC to respond to the
Complaint of plaintiff Joseph Miller is extended to December 31, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

Dated: October 31, 2016

_____________________________
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
Judge of the United State District Court

8
9
10
11

Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100
San Francisco, CA 94104

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Miller v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:16-cv-05710-JST