Fountain Inc. v. Paralenz Inc. et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF THE ENTIRE ACTION. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/4/2017. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

BUCHALTER NEMER
A Professional Corporation
MICHAEL L. MEEKS (SBN: 172000)
LOUISE TRUONG (SBN: 293811)
18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 800
Irvine, CA 92612-0514
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Paralenz Inc., Paralenz APS, and MOEF A/S
MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN (SBN 264695)
LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN
111 N. Market St., Suite 300
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

12
13

Attorney for Plaintiff
FOUNTAIN INC.

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

)
FOUNTAIN INC., a California corporation, )
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
PARALENZ INC., a Delaware corporation; )
PARALENZ APS, a Danish Anpartsselskab )
)
doing business in the United States as
)
PARALENZ INC.; and MOEF A/S, a
)
Danish Aktieselskab doing business in the
)
)
United States as PARALENZ INC.,
)
)
Defendants.
)

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-5831-CRB
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
THE ENTIRE ACTION

26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE OF THE ENTIRE ACTION

1

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-5831-CRB

1

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the voluntary

2

dismissal with prejudice of the entire action. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and

3

costs in both the present action and in the related previous action in this District between

4

Plaintiff Fountain Inc. and Defendant Paralenz ApS (then doing business as Octospot ApS) of

5

Fountain Inc. vs. Octospot ApS, Case No. 4:16-CV-04473-KAW.

6
7
8

DATED: December 29, 2016

BUCHALTER NEMER
A Professional Corporation

9
10
By:

/s/ Louise Truong
MICHAEL L. MEEKS
LOUISE TRUONG
Attorneys for Defendants Paralenz Inc., Paralenz APS,
and MOEF A/S

11
12
13
14
15

DATED: December 29, 2016

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN

16
17
By:

/s/ Michael J. Sullivan
MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN
Attorney for Plaintiff Fountain, Inc.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE OF THE ENTIRE ACTION

2

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-5831-CRB

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of dismissal, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:

4

1.

The present action is dismissed with prejudice.

5

2.

Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs in both the present

6

action and in the related previous action in this District between Plaintiff Fountain Inc.

7

and Defendant Paralenz ApS (then doing business as Octospot ApS) of Fountain Inc. vs.

8

Octospot ApS, Case No. 4:16-CV-04473-KAW.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13

January 4, 2017
DATED: ______________________

14

_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE OF THE ENTIRE ACTION

3

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-5831-CRB