Coppernoll v. Hamcor, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/8/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
WYATT COPPERNOLL,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER REQUESTING
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

HAMCOR, INC.,
Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 16-05936 WHA

Prior to the hearing on January 12, 2017, on defendant’s motion to compel arbitration

17

and plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint to add a PAGA claim, the Court requests

18

supplemental briefing from both sides on the following question:

19
20
21

Assuming the Supreme Court reverses the Ninth Circuit’s decision
in Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP, would that reversal apply
retroactively to district court proceedings that relied on the Morris
decision in the interim?

22

Each side’s supplemental brief shall not exceed THREE PAGES in length with no

23

footnotes, and shall be double spaced using size 12 font and normal margins. The supplemental

24

briefs are due by DECEMBER 29 AT NOON.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: December 8, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE