Depianti et al v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.
Filing
236
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY JEFFREY MARK ROSIN by Hon. William Alsup denying #224 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GIOVANI DEPIANTI, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
No. C 16-05961 WHA
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER DENYING PRO
HAC VICE APPLICATION
OF ATTORNEY JEFFREY
MARK ROSIN
JAN-PRO FRANCHISING
INTERNATIONAL, INC,
Defendant.
15
/
16
17
The pro hac vice application of Attorney Jeffrey Mark Rosin (Dkt. No. 224) is DENIED
18
for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that
19
“he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the
20
highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis
21
added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only
22
identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Massachusetts” — is inadequate
23
under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does
24
not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is
25
submitted.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: January 13, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?