Depianti et al v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.
NOTICE RE ORAL ARGUMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/3/17. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2017)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
GLORIA ROMAN, GERARDO VAZQUEZ,
No. C 16-05961 WHA
NOTICE RE ORAL
Plaintiffs’ agreements with their respective regional master franchisees do not set aside
any rights on behalf of Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., incorporate-by-reference the
regional master franchisees’ agreements with Jan-Pro, or otherwise indicate that Jan-Pro is a
third-party beneficiary of those agreements. Plaintiffs’ assertions that Jan-Pro maintains a right
of control over them all cite to the regional master franchisee’s agreements with Jan-Pro (to
which our plaintiffs are not parties) with Jan-Pro or excerpt portions of their agreements with
the regional master franchisees in which “Jan-Pro” is defined as the regional master franchisee,
not as our defendant. Neither side directly addresses this discrepancy or how it bears on our
case in their briefs. Both sides shall please be prepared to address it at oral argument.
Dated: May 3, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?