Depianti et al v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.

Filing 262

NOTICE RE ORAL ARGUMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/3/17. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 GLORIA ROMAN, GERARDO VAZQUEZ, JUAN AGUILAR, No. C 16-05961 WHA Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 v. Defendant. / 16 17 NOTICE RE ORAL ARGUMENT JAN-PRO FRANCHISING INTERNATIONAL, INC, Plaintiffs’ agreements with their respective regional master franchisees do not set aside 18 any rights on behalf of Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., incorporate-by-reference the 19 regional master franchisees’ agreements with Jan-Pro, or otherwise indicate that Jan-Pro is a 20 third-party beneficiary of those agreements. Plaintiffs’ assertions that Jan-Pro maintains a right 21 of control over them all cite to the regional master franchisee’s agreements with Jan-Pro (to 22 which our plaintiffs are not parties) with Jan-Pro or excerpt portions of their agreements with 23 the regional master franchisees in which “Jan-Pro” is defined as the regional master franchisee, 24 not as our defendant. Neither side directly addresses this discrepancy or how it bears on our 25 case in their briefs. Both sides shall please be prepared to address it at oral argument. 26 27 28 Dated: May 3, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?