Nannegari v. Moore Law Group

Filing 19

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 9, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

J. Erik Heath, Esq. (SBN 304683)
100 Bush Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone Number: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email Address: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
ROHIT NANNEGARI

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

ROHIT NANNEGARI,
Plaintiff,

11

Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-6060-MMC
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

v.

12

THE MOORE LAW GROUP, A PROF.
CORP.,
Defendant.

13
14
15
16

COME NOW Plaintiff ROHIT NANNEGARI and Defendant THE MOORE LAW
17
GROUP, A PROF. CORP., by and through the undersigned counsel of record, and file this
18
Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(2). It is agreed
19

that each party will bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.

20
21
Dated: 1/9/2017

J. ERIK HEATH, ATTORNEY AT LAW

22
23

By:

24
25
26

//

27

/s/ Jon Erik Heath
J. Erik Heath
Attorney for Plaintiff
ROHIT NANNEGARI

//

28

Nannegari v. The Moore Law Group, APC
Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice

Case No. 3:16-cv-6060
Page 1

1

Dated: 1/9/2017

THE MOORE LAW GROUP, A.P.C.

2
By:

3
4

/s/ Ramin Mahdavi
Ramin Mahdavi
Attorney for Defendant
THE MOORE LAW GROUP, A.P.C.

5
6
7
8
9
10

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, J. Erik Heath, attest that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under
penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and
correct. Executed this 9th day of January, 2017, at San Francisco.

11
By:

12

/s/ Jon Erik Heath
J. Erik Heath

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Nannegari v. The Moore Law Group, APC
Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice

Case No. 3:16-cv-6060
Page 2

ORDER

1
2
3

Having read the foregoing stipulation and agreement of the parties, and for good cause
appearing, the Court hereby orders:

4

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT,

5

The above action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and

6

attorney’s fees.

7
8
9

January 9, 2017
Dated: ______________

_____________________________
________
_______________ ___________
_____ _
_
Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
Chesney
Hon. Maxine
o
h
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
US

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Nannegari v. The Moore Law Group, APC
[Proposed] Order on Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice

Case No. 3:16-cv-6060
Page 3