Spectra Licensing Group, LLC v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. et al

Filing 33

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying 31 Motion to Dismiss. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SPECTRA LICENSING GROUP, LLC,

Case No. 16-cv-06093-RS

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS

9
MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et
al.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Defendants.

12
13

Plaintiff Spectra Licensing Group LLC (“Spectra”) initiated this patent infringement

14

lawsuit in April 2016. On November 22, 2016, defendants Marvell Semiconductor Inc. and

15

Marvell Technology Group LTD (collectively “Marvell”) filed a motion to dismiss the complaint

16

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Rather than respond to the motion, Spectra

17

opted to file an amended complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) (providing plaintiffs leave to amend

18

once as a matter of course within 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b)). Marvell’s

19

motion is therefore moot and denied without prejudice.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: December 7, 2016
______________________________________
______________________________________
__
____
__
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge