Spectra Licensing Group, LLC v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. et al
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 35 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SPECTRA LICENSING GROUP, LLC,
Case No. 16-cv-06093-RS
MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
Defendants Marvell Semiconductor Inc. and Marvell Technology Group LTD (collectively
“Marvell”) move, pursuant to Local Rule 6-3, to extend their deadline to file a response to Plaintiff
Spectra Licensing Group LLC’s (“Spectra”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on the ground
that key Marvell personnel are on holiday vacation or otherwise unavailable between now and the
current filing deadline. Their response is currently due on December 20, 2016 and they request a
limited extension until January 10, 2017. Good cause appearing, Marvell’s request for a limited
extension is hereby granted. Marvell must respond to Spectra’s FAC by January 10, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 19, 2016
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?