Spectra Licensing Group, LLC v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. et al

Filing 37

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 35 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SPECTRA LICENSING GROUP, LLC,

Case No. 16-cv-06093-RS

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et
al.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants.

12
13

Defendants Marvell Semiconductor Inc. and Marvell Technology Group LTD (collectively

14

“Marvell”) move, pursuant to Local Rule 6-3, to extend their deadline to file a response to Plaintiff

15

Spectra Licensing Group LLC’s (“Spectra”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on the ground

16

that key Marvell personnel are on holiday vacation or otherwise unavailable between now and the

17

current filing deadline. Their response is currently due on December 20, 2016 and they request a

18

limited extension until January 10, 2017. Good cause appearing, Marvell’s request for a limited

19

extension is hereby granted. Marvell must respond to Spectra’s FAC by January 10, 2017.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: December 19, 2016
______________________________________
_______________
_________________________
____
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge