Spectra Licensing Group, LLC v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. et al

Filing 37

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 35 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SPECTRA LICENSING GROUP, LLC, Case No. 16-cv-06093-RS Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 12 13 Defendants Marvell Semiconductor Inc. and Marvell Technology Group LTD (collectively 14 “Marvell”) move, pursuant to Local Rule 6-3, to extend their deadline to file a response to Plaintiff 15 Spectra Licensing Group LLC’s (“Spectra”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on the ground 16 that key Marvell personnel are on holiday vacation or otherwise unavailable between now and the 17 current filing deadline. Their response is currently due on December 20, 2016 and they request a 18 limited extension until January 10, 2017. Good cause appearing, Marvell’s request for a limited 19 extension is hereby granted. Marvell must respond to Spectra’s FAC by January 10, 2017. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 19, 2016 ______________________________________ _______________ _________________________ ____ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?