Sandoval v. Chipotle Services, LLC et al

Filing 22

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 21 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CARMEN CORTES SANDOVAL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 15 CHIPOTLE SERVICES, LLC; CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.; CLAUDIA CHOTOJ; and DOES 1 through 100, 16 17 Defendants. 18 Case No. 3:16-cv-06122-HSG ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO APPEAR BY COURTCALL AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: February 7, 2017 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA Judge: The Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having considered Plaintiff’s Motion to Allow Plaintiff’s Counsel, Michael H. Kim, to appear by Courtcall at the Case Management Conference scheduled for February 7, 2017 at 2:00 p.m., and good cause appearing therefor, the Court ORDERS as follows: The Motion is GRANTED; Plaintiff’s counsel, Michael H. Kim, is permitted to appear by Courtcall at the Case Case No. 3:16-cv-06122-HSG ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO APPEAR BY COURTCALL AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 Management Conference scheduled for February 7, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 10 of this Court. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: February 3, 2017 _________________________________ United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:16-cv-06122-HSG 2 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO APPEAR BY COURTCALL AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?