Taymuree et al v. Electronic Document Processing, Inc. et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 17 Stipulation and Order Dismissing Case filed by Carolynn Taymuree, Zohra Richardson. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 23, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

James A. Michel
State Bar No. 184730
2912 Diamond St. #373
San Francisco CA 94131
415/ 239-4949
(Fax [phone])
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
CAROLYNN TAYMUREE and
ZOHRA RICHARDSON

7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION

8
9
10
11

CAROLYNN TAYMUREE, an
individual, and ZOHRA
RICHARDSON, an individual,
Plaintiff,

12

15
16

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT
PROCESSING, INC., a California
corporation; PRESCOTT
WOODFORD, individually and in his
official capacity; and DOES 1 through
10, inclusive,

17
18

STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING CASE

v.

13
14

Case No. 3:16-cv-06139 JST

Defendants.
_________________________/

19

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs CAROLYNN TAYMUREE and

20
21

ZOHRA RICHARDSON, and Defendants, ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT

22

PROCESSING, INC. and PRESCOTT WOODFORD, stipulate, and the Court

23

hereby orders, as follows:
1. The dispute between the parties has been settled; therefore, the claims

24
25

asserted by Plaintiffs against all Defendants in the above-entitled case are hereby

26

dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).

27

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees.

28

///
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE

1
2

DATED: February 23, 2017

___/s/ Steven S. Nimoy_______
STEVEN S. NIMOY

Soltman, Levitt, Flaherty & Wattles LLP

3

Attorneys for Defendants
ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT
PROCESSING, INC. and
PRESCOTT WOODFORD

4
5
6
7

Attestation pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3)

8

The undersigned attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has

9

been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their

10

signatures on the document.

11
12

DATED: February 23, 2017

13
14

___/s/ James A. Michel_______
JAMES A. MICHEL
Attorney for Plaintiffs
CAROLYN TAYMUREE and
ZOHRA RICHARDSON

15
16

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19

DATED: _________________
February 23, 2017

________________________
HON. JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE