Buckins v. McCoy et al

Filing 25

DISREGARD - DUPLICATE FILED IN ERROR - ORDER REGARDING SERVICE ON DEBORAH M. WALKER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/24/2017) Modified on 8/24/2017 (Illston, Susan).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DARRELL EDWARD BUCKINS, Plaintiff, 8 9 ORDER RE. SERVICE ISSUES AND VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE v. 10 BRENDA MCCOY, et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 16-cv-06157-SI Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 1 and 23 12 13 In this pro se prisoner’s civil rights action, Darrell Buckins complained about his medical 14 care while he was housed at the Glenn Dyer Detention Facility in Oakland, California. Service of 15 process was ordered on eight defendants, but only one defendant (i.e., Alameda County) has 16 appeared in this action so far. Service of process apparently was attempted on other defendants at 17 various addresses provided by Buckins, but service was not attempted on the defendants at the jail. 18 Service will now be attempted at the jail. 19 Accordingly, the clerk shall issue a summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, 20 without prepayment of fees, the summons, a copy of the amended complaint, a copy of the order 21 of service, and a copy of this order upon each of the following defendants at the Glenn Dyer 22 Detention Facility at 550 6th Street, Oakland, CA 94607: 23 - Dr. Brenda McCoy - Debra Walker (licensed vocational nurse) - Jeffrey Cooper (physician’s assistant) - Corizon Health Services, Inc. - Dr. Harold Orr - Dr. Maria Magat - Alameda County Sheriff Gregory Ahern 24 25 26 27 Other than Sheriff Ahern, the individual defendants apparently work for Corizon Health Services, 28 Inc., the health care provider for the Glenn Dyer Detention Facility. 1 In light of the need to resolve the service of process problems for seven of the eight 2 defendants, the court now VACATES the briefing schedule for all defendants to file a motion for 3 summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Defendant Alameda County’s motion for an 4 extension of the deadline to file a dispositive motion is DISMISSED as moot because the briefing 5 schedule is now being vacated. (Docket No. 23.) Once the service of process problems are 6 resolved, the court will set a new briefing schedule so that all the defendants will be on the same 7 briefing schedule if possible. 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 A separate order is being issued today to deal with the potentially erroneous service on defendant Walker. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 24, 2017 ______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?