Cagle et al v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC et al

Filing 12

ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James finding as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss. Answer or responsive pleading due 12/19/2016. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL CAGLE, et al., Case No. 16-cv-06187-MEJ Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT v. 9 10 OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Defendants HSBC Bank, USA and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC (together, 14 “Defendants”) moved to dismiss the Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Michael and Anna Cagle 15 (together, “Plaintiffs”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Mot., Dkt. No. 16 7. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to the Motion and indicated they would file an 17 amended complaint. See Not. of Non-Opp’n, Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiffs did so on November 23, 18 2016. See Am. Compl., Dkt. No. 11. 19 A party may amend its pleading once “as a matter of course” within “21 days after service 20 of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). “[T]he general rule is that 21 an amended complaint supercedes the original complaint and renders it without legal effect . . . .” 22 Lacey v. Maricopa Cty., 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). As no prior amended 23 complaints have been filed, Plaintiffs can file an amended complaint as a matter of course under 24 Rule 15(a). Further, “[d]ismissal of the superseded original complaint would not alter the 25 proceedings . . . as the parties would continue to litigate the merits of the claims contained in the 26 now-operative First Amended Complaint.” Liberi v. Defend Our Freedoms Founds., Inc., 509 27 Fed. App’x 595, 596 (9th Cir. 2013) (dismissing as moot appeal of denial of an anti-SLAPP 28 motion regarding a superseded complaint). 1 Since the pending Motion is based on the original complaint, the Court hereby DENIES 2 the Motion as moot. Defendants shall file an answer or other responsive pleading within 21 days 3 from the date of this Order. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: November 28, 2016 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?