Nusbaum v. City of Hayward, et al

Filing 51

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Breyer on 12/22/2017. (crblc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JASON NUSBAUM, Plaintiff, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Case No. 16-cv-06264-CRB v. JOSHUA CANNON, et al., Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING WITHIN THE APPLICABLE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Jason Nusbaum filed this civil rights complaint in late 2016, alleging among other 14 things an unconstitutional arrest and unlawful use of force by the Hayward Police Dept. 15 Nusbaum’s attorneys withdrew from the case on July 11, 2017. Dkt. 31. Since then, 16 Nusbaum has been unable to find legal representation, and has had difficulty proceeding 17 pro se, failing to comply with at least two discovery deadlines. See dkts. 33, 40, 42. The 18 Court granted Nusbaum’s request to postpone a status conference originally scheduled for 19 Aug. 25, 2017, to give him time to find a new lawyer. Dkt. 37. The Court attempted to 20 hold a status conference on Oct. 27, allowing Nusbaum to appear by telephone, but 21 Nusbaum was unable to properly connect via the telephonic system. Dkt. 42. The Court 22 rescheduled the status conference for Nov. 9, ordering Nusbaum to appear in person. Dkt. 23 42. Nusbaum did not appear. Dkt. 43. Subsequently, he moved the Court for another 24 continuance. Dkt. 44. The Court granted this request, stating that it would dismiss the 25 case if Nusbaum did not appear on Dec. 15. Dkt. 45. Nusbaum again failed to appear. 26 While the Court is sympathetic to the difficulties Nusbaum has had in prosecuting 27 his case, it must also consider judicial efficiency and fairness to the opposing parties. The 28 Court therefore DISMISSES the case for failure to prosecute without prejudice to refiling

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?