Nusbaum v. City of Hayward, et al
Filing
51
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Breyer on 12/22/2017. (crblc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
JASON NUSBAUM,
Plaintiff,
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Case No. 16-cv-06264-CRB
v.
JOSHUA CANNON, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO
REFILING WITHIN THE
APPLICABLE STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS
Jason Nusbaum filed this civil rights complaint in late 2016, alleging among other
14
things an unconstitutional arrest and unlawful use of force by the Hayward Police Dept.
15
Nusbaum’s attorneys withdrew from the case on July 11, 2017. Dkt. 31. Since then,
16
Nusbaum has been unable to find legal representation, and has had difficulty proceeding
17
pro se, failing to comply with at least two discovery deadlines. See dkts. 33, 40, 42. The
18
Court granted Nusbaum’s request to postpone a status conference originally scheduled for
19
Aug. 25, 2017, to give him time to find a new lawyer. Dkt. 37. The Court attempted to
20
hold a status conference on Oct. 27, allowing Nusbaum to appear by telephone, but
21
Nusbaum was unable to properly connect via the telephonic system. Dkt. 42. The Court
22
rescheduled the status conference for Nov. 9, ordering Nusbaum to appear in person. Dkt.
23
42. Nusbaum did not appear. Dkt. 43. Subsequently, he moved the Court for another
24
continuance. Dkt. 44. The Court granted this request, stating that it would dismiss the
25
case if Nusbaum did not appear on Dec. 15. Dkt. 45. Nusbaum again failed to appear.
26
While the Court is sympathetic to the difficulties Nusbaum has had in prosecuting
27
his case, it must also consider judicial efficiency and fairness to the opposing parties. The
28
Court therefore DISMISSES the case for failure to prosecute without prejudice to refiling
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?