Nadaf-Rahrov et al v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al

Filing 37

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/29/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ENAYATOLLAH NADAF-RAHROV, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, 10 ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS v. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 16-cv-06323-RS 12 SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 27) and 15 16 plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. No. 34) are both suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the 17 hearings set for April 20, 2017 and April 6, 2017, respectively, are vacated. Plaintiffs’ motion is 18 unopposed and good cause appears to grant it.1 Defendants’ motion is thereby moot, and is denied 19 on that basis. The matter is dismissed. The Clerk shall close the file. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: March 29, 2017 ______________________________________ ____________________ _________________ __ _ _______ __ _ _ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 It is unclear, however, why plaintiffs’ did not voluntarily dismiss prior to putting defendants to the burden of moving to dismiss.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?