Nadaf-Rahrov et al v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al

Filing 37

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/29/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
ENAYATOLLAH NADAF-RAHROV, et
al.,

9

Plaintiffs,

10

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS

v.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 16-cv-06323-RS

12

SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING,
et al.,

13

Defendants.
14
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 27) and

15
16

plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. No. 34) are both suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the

17

hearings set for April 20, 2017 and April 6, 2017, respectively, are vacated. Plaintiffs’ motion is

18

unopposed and good cause appears to grant it.1 Defendants’ motion is thereby moot, and is denied

19

on that basis. The matter is dismissed. The Clerk shall close the file.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

Dated: March 29, 2017
______________________________________
____________________ _________________
__
_
_______
__ _
_
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28

1

It is unclear, however, why plaintiffs’ did not voluntarily dismiss prior to putting defendants to
the burden of moving to dismiss.