Hicks v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, Motions terminated: 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Synchrony Bank, 16 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 1 Complaint, filed by Synchrony Bank.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/23/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2016)
1 Raffi Kassabian (SBN 260358)
2 REED SMITH LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900
3 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514
Telephone: +1 213 457 8000
4 Facsimile: +1 213 457 8080
5 Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10 Carrie Hicks,
Case No. 3:16-CV-06363-WHA
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
13 Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; Equifax,
Inc.; JPMorgan Chase Bank; Synchrony Bank and
14 DOES 1 through 100 inclusive,
Plaintiff Carrie Hicks (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Synchrony Bank (“Synchrony”), pursuant
to Local Rule 6-1, hereby stipulate that Synchrony has an extension of time, until January 5, 2017, to
respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Plaintiff and Synchrony further stipulate that if Synchrony files a
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, Plaintiff has an additional fourteen days, beyond the
standard response time, to file a response to that Motion to Dismiss.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December __, 2016
Hon. William Alsup
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?