Reckelhoff v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 61

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 57 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER for Dismissal of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. filed by Kenneth Reckelhoff. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 13, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2017)

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)
1 Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)
Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)
2 SAGARIA LAW, P.C.
2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor
3 San Jose, California 95110
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11 KENNETH RECKELHOFF,
12

Federal Case No.: 3:16-cv-06379-JST

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.; et. al.,
15
Defendants.
16

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Kenneth Reckelhoff and

18

19 defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. (erroneously sued as JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.)
20 (“Chase”), through their designated counsel, that Chase be dismissed with prejudice from the
21 above-captioned action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), and that
22 each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
23
24
25
26
27

//
//
//
//
//

28
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

DATED: April 12, 2017

Sagaria Law, P.C.

2
By:

/s/ Elliot W. Gale
Elliot W. Gale
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Kenneth Reckelhoff

3
4
5
6 DATED: April 12, 2017

Covington and Burling LLP

7
8

By:

/s/Megan Rodgers
Megan Rodgers
Attorneys for Defendant
Chase Bank USA, N.A. (erroneously sued as JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A.)

9
10
11
12

13 I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this
14 Stipulation. I hereby attest that Megan Rodgers has concurred in this filing.
/s/ Elliot Gale
15
16

[PROPOSED] ORDER

17
18
19
20
21
22

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Chase is dismissed with prejudice from the
above-captioned action. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 13, 2017
JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER