SONOMA HORSE PARK v. VOLTAIRE DESIGN USA, INC. et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER 20 TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS: Motion Hearing re: 11 Motion to Dismiss continued from 2/7/2017 to 3/21/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Responses due by 2/21/2017. Replies due by 2/28/2017. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 1/25/2017. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2017)

Download PDF
1 J. Allison Tussey, SBN 262767 TUSSEY LAW 2 288 Scenic Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95407 3 (707) 588-8532 allison@tusseylaw.com 4 Counsel for SONOMA HORSE PARK 5 IVO LABAR (203492) 6 labar@kerrwagstaffe.com LAURA SEEGAL (307344) 7 seegal@kerrwagstaffe.com KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 8 101 Mission Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105–1727 9 Telephone: (415) 371-8500 Fax: (415) 371-0500 10 Attorney for VOLTAIRE DESIGN USA, INC. 11 AND BRICE GOGUET 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 SONOMA HORSE PARK, a California 17 Corporation, 18 19 Plaintiff(s), vs. 20 VOLTAIRE DESIGN, USA, INC., and BRICE GOGUET, 21 22 Defendant(s). 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:16-CV-06475-EDL STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER DATE: February 7, 2017 TIME: 9:00 a.m. DEPT: E 25 26 27 28 -1Case No. 3:16-CV-06475-EDL STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS 1 Plaintiff, Sonoma Horse Park, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants, Voltaire Design, USA and 2 Brice Goguet (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby submit this stipulated request that the Court 3 continue the current motion to dismiss for a brief period of time to allow the parties to continue 4 their efforts to resolve this matter without the need for formal litigation. 5 The attorneys for both parties have been meeting in good faith, and are committed to using 6 their best efforts to settle the matter without further court intervention. The parties are incredibly 7 close in settlement figures and believe this matter will be resolved informally. However, counsel 8 for Defendants is currently in trial and expects to be in trial for at least two weeks. 9 The pending motion is set for February 7, 2017. The parties therefore request that the 10 pending motion be continued for approximately six (6) weeks to March 21, 2017, with the response 11 due on February 21, 2017, and reply due on February 28, 2017. 12 It is so stipulated. 13 Dated: January 24, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 14 By: 15 /s/ J. Allison Tussey J. Allison Tussey 16 Attorney for SONOMA HORSE PARK 17 18 Dated: January 24, 2017 By: 19 20 Attorney for VOLTAIRE DESIGN USA, INC. AND BRICE GOGUET 21 22 23 /s/ Laura Seegal LAURA SEEGAL ATTESTATION I, Laura Seegal, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 24 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND REQUEST FOR 25 ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Counsel for Plaintiff, has 26 concurred in this filing. 27 Dated: January 24, 2017 /s/ Laura Seegal LAURA SEEGAL 28 -2Case No. 3:16-CV-06475-EDL STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS 1 ORDER 2 The Court, having reviewed the Stipulated Request to Continue Hearing on Motion to 3 Dismiss, and good cause being shown therefore, hereby continues the pending Motion to Dismiss 4 from February 7, 2017, to March 21, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., in Department E, with responses to be filed 5 by February 21, 2017, and reply to be filed by February 28, 2017. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED 7 DATED: January 25, 2017 8 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3Case No. 3:16-CV-06475-EDL STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?