Benton v. Clarity Services, Inc.

Filing 15

ORDER RE. STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint no later than December 12, 2016. If defendant file s a responsive pleading other than an answer, plaintiff shall file an opposition to said pleading no later than January 9, 2017, and defendant shall file a reply no later than January 16, 2017. If plaintiff files a motion to remand the action, plain tiff shall file said motion no later than December 14, 2016. Defendant shall file an opposition to said motion no later than January 6, 2017, and plaintiff shall file a reply no later than January 13, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/22/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

RONALD I. RAETHER, JR. (SBN 303118)
[e-mail]
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
5 Park Plaza, Suite 1400
Irvine, CA 92614-2545
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
MARK C. MAO (SBN 236165)
[e-mail]
SHEILA M. PHAM (SBN 293673)
[e-mail]
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
580 California Street, Suite 1100
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
CLARITY SERVICES, INC.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15

JOYCE BENTON,

16

Plaintiff,

Case No. 3:16-cv-06583-MMC

17

v.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC.
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND
PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

18

CLARITY SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,

Complaint filed: October 13, 2016

19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
T ROU T MA N S ANDE RS LLP
580 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1100
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06583-MMC

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, and by and through their counsel, Plaintiff

2

Joyce Benton (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. (“Clarity”) (collectively, the

3

“Parties”), hereby agree to the following briefing schedule and seek an Order from the Court

4

confirming same:

5
6

Clarity shall have until December 12, 2016 to answer or otherwise respond to the
Complaint.

7

If Clarity files a responsive pleading other than an Answer, Plaintiff shall have until

8

January 9, 2017 to file an opposition to Clarity’s Motion, and Clarity shall have until January 16,

9

2017 to file a reply.

10

This Stipulation is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to seek a remand of the action,

11

which shall be due on December 14, 2016. If Plaintiff files a Motion to Remand the action,

12

Clarity’s opposition shall be filed on January 6, 2017, and Plaintiff’s reply shall be filed on

13

January 13, 2017.

14
15

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED.
///

16

///

17

///

18

///

19

///

20

///

21
22
23

///
///

24
25
26
27
28
T ROU T MA N S ANDE RS LLP
580 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1100
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06583-MMC

1

Dated: November 21, 2016

TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Sheila M. Pham
Ronald I. Raether, Jr.
Mark C. Mao
Sheila M. Pham
Attorneys for Defendant Clarity Services,
Inc.

4
5
6
7

CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP

8
9

By: /s/ Christian Schreiber
Mark. A. Chavez
Christian Schreiber
Attorneys for Plaintiff Joyce Benton

10
11
12
13

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15

DATE: ______________________
November 22, 2016

_____________________________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Court Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
T ROU T MA N S ANDE RS LLP
580 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1100
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE