Benton v. Clarity Services, Inc.

Filing 59

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DEADLINES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The discovery cutoff (Phase One)is extended to November 24, 2017. The expert disclosure deadline is extended to October 13, 2017, and the rebuttal expert disclosure deadline is extende d to October 27, 2017. The expert discovery cutoff is extended to October 27, 2017. The summary judgment motion filing deadline is extended to December 15, 2017, the deadline to file opposition to any summary judgment motion is extended to January 12, 2018, and the deadline to file a reply is extended to January 22, 2018. The summary judgment hearing is continued from January 12, 2018, to February 16, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. The Further Case Management Conference is continued from March 16, 2018, to April 13, 2018, at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than April 6, 2018. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 08/25/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP Mark A. Chavez (SBN 90858) Christian Schreiber (SBN 245597) 42 Miller Avenue Mill Valley, California 94941 Telephone: (415) 381-5599 Facsimile: (415) 381-5572 mark@chavezgertler.com christian@chavezgertler.com Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Classes RONALD I. RAETHER, JR. (SBN 303118) ronald.raether@troutmansanders.com TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1400 Irvine, CA 92614-2545 Telephone: (949) 622.2700 Facsimile: (949) 622.2739 Additional Counsel listed on Signature Page Attorneys for Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 JOYCE BENTON, Plaintiff, 20 21 v. 22 CLARITY SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1 23 through 50, inclusive, 24 25 26 27 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:16-CV-06583-MMC STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEADLINES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 28 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER RE DEADLINES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 Plaintiff Joyce Benton (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. (“Clarity”) (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby stipulate to the following: WHEREAS, following an initial case management conference, the Court issued a scheduling order on March 31, 2017 (ECF Doc. No. 51); and 5 WHEREAS, since the Order was issued, the Parties have been actively engaged in 6 discovery and motion practice in this matter and the related case pending in the Alameda County 7 Superior Court (Hon. Brad Seligman presiding); and 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to mediate this case on October 16, 2017 before the Hon. John Leo Wagner (Ret.); and WHEREAS, the Parties are finalizing the deposition dates for Plaintiff and for Clarity’s corporate designee pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 30(b)(6); and WHEREAS, the Parties believe an adjustment to the Order is warranted to allow for the completion of mediation and depositions; THEREFORE, THE PARTIES RESPECTFULLY REQUEST that the current schedule be modified to the following: 16 BRIEFING SCHEDULE - SUMMARY JUDGMENT: 17 Discovery cutoff (Phase One): November 24, 2017 18 Expert Disclosure: October 13, 2017 19 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: October 27, 2017 20 Expert Discovery Cutoff: December 8, 2017 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filing deadline: December 15, 2017 22 Opposition due: January 12, 2018. 23 Reply due: January 22, 2018. 24 Summary Judgment Motion Hearing: February 16, 2018 at 9:00 AM. 25 A Proposed Order incorporating the above relief is attached and submitted herewith. 26 27 Dated: August 23, 2017 CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP 28 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER RE DEADLINES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE /s/ Christian Schreiber Christian Schreiber Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1 2 3 4 Dated: August 25, 2017 TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 5 By: 6 7 /s/ Ronald Raether Ronald I. Raether Attorneys for Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 FEINSTEIN DOYLE PAYNE & KRAVEC, LLC James M. Pietz (Pa. I.D. 55406) (pro hac vice) Gregory A. Murray (Pa. I.D. 316144) (pro hac vice) 429 Fourth Avenue Law and Finance Building, Suite 1300 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Telephone: 412-281-8400 Facsimile: 412-281-1007 jpietz@fdpklaw.com gmurray@fdpklaw.com Additional Counsel for Plaintiff and the Proposed Classes MARK C. MAO (SBN 236165) mark.mao@troutmansanders.com SHEILA M. PHAM (SBN 293673) sheila.pham@troutmansanders.com TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 580 California Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 447-5700 Facsimile: (415) 447-5710 DAVID GETTINGS (admitted pro hac vice) david.gettings@troutmansanders.com TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 222 Central Park Avenue Suite 2000 Virginia Beach, VA 23462 Telephone: (757) 687-7500 Fax: (757) 687-7510 27 Additional Counsel for Defendant Clarity Services, Inc 28 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER RE DEADLINES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER Having read the stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby Orders the following briefing schedule: 4 Discovery cutoff (Phase One): November 24, 2017 5 Expert Disclosure: October 13, 2017 6 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: October 27, 2017 7 Expert Discovery Cutoff: December 8, 2017 8 Motion for Summary Judgment filing deadline: December 15, 2017 9 Opposition due: January 12, 2018. 10 Reply due: January 22, 2018. 11 Summary Judgment Motion Hearing: February 16, 2018 at 9:00 AM. 12 All other dates previously scheduled by the Court will remain in effect. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Further Case Management Conference is continued to April 13, 2018; a Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than April 6, 2018. 15 August 25 Dated: _______________, 2017 13 16 17 ____________________________ Honorable Maxine Chesney United States District Court Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEADLINES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?